Cail Young
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 1,852
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 40
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Website
- www.inspirationstudios.com.au
But I like the lower ISO range for the lower noise. Thought it would be nice to have zebra in that range too, otherwise it's a bit useless i think. And the manual doesn't say anything about ISO 100–200 beeing similar to underexposing!?
Page 12:
The sequence of 12-bit RAW images received from the sensor is compressed using proprietary wavelet based REDCODE™ RAW compression. The RAW data recorded is independent of the RGB signal monitored from the monitoring path. ISO, white balance or other RGB color space adjustments made to the monitoring path are not burned into the recorded 12-bit RAW data.
(snip)
The camera’s monitoring path converts 12-bit RAW sensor data white balanced 10-bit 1280 x 720 pixel RGB 4:4:4 video. This signal may be modified using ISO, white balance or other RGB color space adjustments and provides monitor feeds for the RED-EVF, RED-LCD, Preview HD-
SDI and HDMI outputs.
In short (and I can't believe I'm still telling people this) the ISO setting on the monitors is for convenience only; do not use it and think that it will fundamentally change what you are recording. That way leads to pain.
The camera is 320 ISO, treat it as such and you'll go far. Expose to the right while it's on this setting for best results. If you must meter, meter for 250 or 200 but leave the damn camera setting alone.