Build 16... taste

[BASSAM MSSALATIE]

One more to chew on... ISO 200.

Build 16 now lets you use slower ISOs with no penalty.

Jim

:w00t:THIS will keep me silent for ever . :whistling:CRYSTAL CLEAR

 

[Joseph Hutson]

:w00t:THIS will keep me silent for ever . :whistling:CRYSTAL CLEAR

Good! :bye2:

 

[BASSAM MSSALATIE]

Good! :bye2:

happy are you ?? :angry2: i will not :shifty:

 

[Joseph Hutson]

happy are you ?? :angry2: i will not :shifty:

:bleh:

 

[Jannard]

Here is ISO 2000 (be careful what you say about noise unless you know what you are talking about).

1st is 100% crop with no corrections. 2nd has a bit of NR. Check the quality of the noise in the blue channel of the 1st one. This is pretty incredible for ISO 2000.

Jim

 

[Sanjin Jukic]

Leica Noctilux-M 1:1.0/50mm at full aperture plus B16 and you'll get a fascinating wide open performance and amazing footage with non-available light (dark interior or night exterior shot) on RED.

No Arri/Zeiss Master Prime 50mm T 1.3 or any other fast lens could compete with that option.

 

[S. Um]

It is very good for ISO 2000. What does "a bit of NR" entail?

 

[mikeburton]

Wow! Very nice. Can't wait to hear some of the other features of build 16 as well.

 

[number6]

This is one really nice commercial.

 

[Joseph Hutson]

Congrats...by the way, me and the boys were wondering: How did you do it?

 

[Joseph Hutson]

Wow! Very nice. Can't wait to hear some of the other features of build 16 as well.

Be ready for tomorrow.

 

[BASSAM MSSALATIE]

Here is ISO 2000 (be careful what you say about noise unless you know what you are talking about).

Noise ..:huh: what Noise . i don't see any :matrix:
realy great improvment thanks.

 

[David Battistella]

Here is ISO 2000 (be careful what you say about noise unless you know what you are talking about).

1st is 100% crop with no corrections. 2nd has a bit of NR. Check the quality of the noise in the blue channel of the 1st one. This is pretty incredible for ISO 2000.

Jim

Really Nice. Seeing just a little bit of "sharpening noise" (black pixels) around the whitest chips.

The Build 16 noise is more uniform and looks like this will be much easier to deal with in a CC pass A lot of this will with a good S curve, not to mention how much better all of the keying, etc. will be.

Is this under tungsten lighting?
WB settings?

David

 

[Jannard]

Congrats...by the way, me and the boys were wondering: How did you do it?

Why do you think it took us so long!

Jim

 

[Graeme Nattress]

David, that just shows how well RED footage stands up to a bit of mild sharpening, noise and all. As you know, there's no sharpening in the raw, so it's like salt - add to taste.

Graeme

 

[Joseph Hutson]

Why do you think it took us so long!

Jim

It might be long to you, but what you have done in the past 2 years, Sony and all of the other "so-called" big boys have never done.

Thank you.

 

[Jannard]

I think the most amazing thing is that the only differences between ISO 160 and ISO 2000 are the noise levels. The uniformity of color and gamma is unreal. You get to decide your noise tolerance range and make ISO decisions based on that without worrying about color shifts or levels changes.

Jim

 

[Andrew Benz]

Why do you think it took us so long!

Jim

Momma always said never rush the Chef(s)... First my Red(#557), then the e-mail on the EVF being ready and now an amazing preview of build 16. Jim, I am gobsmacked. Thank you, it's a great day to be a Red User.

Andrew

 

[Warren Kommers]

Big time!

 

[David Battistella]

David, that just shows how well RED footage stands up to a bit of mild sharpening, noise and all. As you know, there's no sharpening in the raw, so it's like salt - add to taste.

Graeme

I know. That's what I was saying. There might have been much more in a previous build.

Just a little salt.

Nice work Graeme and team.


David