Joseph Ward
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2007
- Messages
- 1,144
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I hope the other modules will be in the hundreds and not the thousands! :detective2:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The rest is a trip to radio shack (understatement )
not buy much
Guys, think of what goes INTO the modules. Some connectors in a box with a proprietary link on either end can't cost that much. Similarly with, say, recording module or a battery module. The expensive part of the brain. The rest is a trip to radio shack (understatement)
The whole taking Stills with a motion camera seems to be fad to me. With very little real world production use. I'm mean you need the right tools for the job. DSLR's are made for taking stills using still lenses with a direct through the lens view finder.
I'm pretty sure most professional photographers will scream at the idea of not having a optical viewfinder to take stills with. A DSLR is considerably cheaper than any motion camera, and Cinema lenses function way differently to a still lens.
You certainly have the option to build your own boxes from Radio Shack components... do they do development work there also?
Jim
Your assumptions sure are interesting... $5K for modules?
Jim
I was thinking that would put a functional S35 scarlet at $12.5, which is $5k less then the Red One... I thought that might be possible considering the spec differences between the two =)
But really I was just trying to show the cost savings of the modular approach compared to Red "competitors"
You certainly have the option to build your own boxes...
Guys, think of what goes INTO the modules. Some connectors in a box with a proprietary link on either end can't cost that much. Similarly with, say, recording module or a battery module. The expensive part of the brain. The rest is a trip to radio shack (understatement)
Much like you released pinouts for the RED ONE... although presumably a bit more complex.
Guys, think of what goes INTO the modules. Some connectors in a box with a proprietary link on either end can't cost that much. Similarly with, say, recording module or a battery module. The expensive part of the brain. The rest is a trip to radio shack (understatement)
That's like comparing a water pistol to a nuclear warhead.![]()
Sorry, Rory. I have to disagree. That is the problem we have with the RED ONE. Electronics (and their capabilities) are matched to current sensor technology. If we upgrade only the sensor, you are stuck with the features of the electronics. And unlike a Canon 5D, you can upgrade each part if there is a significant "new technology".
As for the stills part being a fad... maybe just to you.
There is no reason to upgrade to an EPIC if you see no advantage to it over a RED ONE. You can keep the RED ONE just as it is, or upgrade the sensor... just as we promised. To dismiss a DSMC as a fad only takes your point of view into account. If you don't need stills capability, an EPIC still represents an incredible price/performance camera for motion only compared to anything ever released into the market.
Your post really surprises me...
Jim