Lawrence Bansbach
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2008
- Messages
- 463
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
So the 4/3 camera would be $3K, too, and there's a nonbreathing 8x constant-T-stop 4/3 (or micro-4/3) T2.4?brainburst and I have been advocating against 2/3" and for a 16:9 four/thirds size sensor for a lot of reasons but particularly due to a lack of 2/3" lenses that a) are reasonably priced and b) actually could resolve 3K as ALL existing were designed for less than 2K - most much less. Some highend 16mm lenses would handle 3K, but there isn't much out there and a lot more expensive than SLR lenses.