Allstar lens is available - 80-200mm T3 PL and 50mm T1.5 PL

[ALLSTAR]

80-200mm T3
Price: $2800USD
Weight: 1.9KG
Length: 19cm
Front diameter: 95mm / 77mm thread
Close Focus: 5ft
Aperture: T3-T22
Focus turning angle: 110 degrees
Coverage: FF35 36x24mm

50MM T1.5
Price: $2600
Weight: 870g
Length: 8cm
Front diameter: 95mm
Close Focus: 50cm
Aperture: T1.5-T22
Focus turning angle: 330 degrees
Coverage: FF35 36x24mm

http://www.allstarcine.com/

Allstar.cine
Tom

 

[Jacek Zakowicz]

Beautiful design Tom.
Congratulations!!!

 

[Jason Diamond]

Is this a Nikon rehouse? Looks nice and clean.

 

[Mark Toia]

very cool... Im very interested...
Front lens diameter for screw on filters? what dimension ?

PM me details.

 

[Yaque Silva-Doyle]

Beauty!!! this zoom with a 24-70 would make such a sweet set.

 

[Bob Gundu]

Oh my...

 

[Matt Gottshalk]

Nice.

 

[Shapour Daneshmand]

Where could this zoom lens be purchased?

 

[Dave Blackham]

Looks very impressive.

 

[luigivaltulini]

wow nice looksss.

you have only a 50mm or other lens? 18/25/35/85/100 ?

 

[Sulekh Suman]

80-200PL

80-200PL

Looking forward to more details.

 

[Les Dittert]

Seems like people will buy these based on the light that bounces off the metal outside (photos posted) rather than the light refracted through the glass.

 

[Patrick Tresch]

Nice!

Any Nikon mount?

I know it can sound strange...

Pat

 

[Dan Kanes]

Tom - I would be more than happy to host your Lenses at My booth at Cinegear in Los Angeles at the end of the month.

You are welcome to come join us, and if you want me to just show the lenses for you, I can do that.

Best,

Dan Kanes
PARALINX, LLC

dan@paralinx.net

 

[Jean Bernard]

Woow! Impressive! What glass is that? Nikon? That is PL right? not a hard mounted AllStar?

 

[Julio Quintana]

Just a guess, but the 80-200mm looks like it's based on the Nikon since the focus scale turns opposite from cine lenses.

 

[Jacek Zakowicz]

I just noticed that too.
That could be a deal breaker for some people.
Nice work- regardless...

 

[Bob Gundu]

Being a Nikon lens over the Canon is far better in my opinion. You can always reverse gears on FF.

 

[Bruce Allen]

Seems like people will buy these based on the light that bounces off the metal outside (photos posted) rather than the light refracted through the glass.

Well, if another manufacturer wants to make a competing $2800 zoom with superior optical performance, they are welcome to do so!

That said... can you name a currently-manufactured 80-200 2.8 lens whose optical performance is so bad that it would actually be distracting to an audience?

The optical quality of the current Canon and Nikon 80-200 2.8 lenses is plenty good for me. Breathing on some models is a little bit of a bother but if the worst thing about the film I make is breathing in some of the shots... that's good enough for me!

Bruce Allen
www.boacinema.com

 

[Kwan Khan]

Nice