Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

"A decade ago, Sony [...] create the first 4K camera

Andrea Biscaro

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Points
6
Website
www.bmovieitalia.com
Today I cross a new advertising from sony on variety online:
http://www.sony.com/be-moved/index.html?XID=O:[maf]_[8352911]_0_112887743_corp_display#Sony4K
The title is inspiring : ARTISTS AND ENGINEERS TAKE A MOVIE FROM SCRIPT TO 4K ULTRA HD "SCREEN.
"Well", I say to my self, - finally sony will give credit for the birth of 4K at the visionary people and customers that supported Red on this "crazy" adventure-
Then I read the second page of the commercial: "A decade ago, Sony and all of the other movie studios got together for a big meeting. Their goal was simple—to set a new standard in digital cinema, giving it the richness and emotive power of film. This discussion spurred the creation of the first 4K digital motion-picture camera, then the first 4K digital projector and, finally, the first 4K TV. We've been there at every stage, from the studio lot to your sofa."
I not believed of what I read!!.
I know... Is just a commercial and, as the "new big thing" that can increase the sell of television is the 4K, everybody on the business should need to pretend to be the creators of 4k and foresight , "a decade ago", what was the future, but, unfortunately, I remember well what my history university professor use to tell us about the risk of accepting the manipulation of the fact. (for who is curious I suggest to read this amazing book; History and Memory by Jacques Le Goff – November 15, 1996)

A decade ago I had set, 10 years before, my company, I had adopted, since 1994, NLE editing system and I knew pretty well all the digital format.
A decade ago I was 10 years "senior" on the the television production and I had few film experience.
A decade ago I was attending almost every year IBC in Amsterdam and every 2 years NAB (plus all the roadshow that Sony, Panasonic, JVC, Thompson etc, was doing in my country)
A decade ago I was an avid reader of all the article and blog on internet about digital world.
A decade ago the most advanced solution you can buy was Varicam from Panasonic or Cinealta from Sony, obviously you need the tape to record and there was different flaw of HD; viper, D20 from Arri where out of my budget, and genesis from Panavision only for the rental house.
A decade ago the digital reflex where shooting picture at 12 megapixel and with our first canon DSLR we do a sort a timelapse that we transfer on a film for a commercial on the theater (2k).

on 2006 we decide to invest on a camera that look "film like" on digital; we believe that digital was the present and the future, and we where mesmerise from Varicam, for the cinema look.
We where almost finalising the purchase when we read in internet an offer from a unknown company that claim to deliver a 4K camera at less then half of the price of the Varicam; tapeless and film like.
I cut short... We turn down Varicam and put our 1k $ for the 661 RedONE and we went on IBC 2007 to meet the guys behind this company (we where confident about the economical situation because we do research and we discover that the guy who founded the company had just received a lot of money after selling is company to one of our customers, Luxotica, a serious company that we know for sure that deal only with other serious company).
ANYONE THAT WE MEET ON THE FILM AND DIGITAL MARKET (selling, distribution, production, etc.) was, on 2006-2007-2008 and part of 2009, believed and claim that 4K was something that can't be achieve soon and a sort of useless scam.
I love to name the "ANYONE:
The developer of the Varicam, japanese, that we meet on a special presentation on 2006 in Venice (Italy) when we where supporting the launch of the first full HD tv channel in Italy,
The Arri guys on several fair (IBC 2007, NAB 2008, Ibc 2008, NAB 2009, IBC 2009),
Technicolor Italy (2008-2009) that not only state that the 4k was and will be useless, but also that digital projection never erase the film; a quick note, technicolor Italy was printing all the film for the european market... I wrote "was" because now, since 2013 is out of business in italy/europe,
and "last but not least" SONY, the creators of this amazing commercial, that, in several situation try to convince us and other customers, on the 2008, 2009 and beginning of 2010, that the future was the new F35 camera (250k$ for the camera plus hd recorder etc.. more or less 500k $ of investment for camera, lens and editing) and the 2k was and will be the maximum standard, not mentioning that tapeless camera where not possible for high quality images.

At the end of 2014, reading this commercial, make me think that sometime, and this "sometime" is becoming really often, company believe that people and customer are stupid and "true" is what is state "aloud".

Unfortunately I was not invited to the "big meeting" that sony had with all the others movie studios a decade ago, and maybe it really happen (I am picturing in my mind this "big meeting" and I don' know why but i start laughing... :) ) but if that is true (an I hope that someone on the forum can tell me that this "meeting" happen) is even worst because they try to sell, 4 years after this meeting, super-expensive and obsolete technology (f35) to customer that will never recover his investment (that is what is happen to the unlucky buyers of f35)

The bottom line is: what really change for the customers and me if is true or not if "Sony and all of the other movie studios got together for a big meeting [...] to set a new standard in digital cinema,."?
Maybe nothing or, maybe... that, as a customer, I will be more keen to trust, and buy the products, from a company that is working to bring the best technology available at the best price and not from some company that fake the reality pretending to be a game changer when they where a fierce "enemy" of this technology "a decade ago" and even less, except to change their mind and fake the fact when they realise how wrong they was.

Humility and honesty sometime work better then arrogance and dishonesty.
 
You know, a few years ago (2, maybe 3) I saw a Taylor Swift music video shown in a movie theater, presented by Sony, when they claimed that this was the first Music video shot in 4K. I started laughing out loud, couldn't help it, and people thought I had a weird sense of humor.
Sony has been trying to hijack "The creation of 4K" for quite a while, and you know, when a lie gets repeated enough, it sure will become truth for those who don't know better.
 
I see and hear stuff like this and it makes me crazy. Like when Windows 95 claimed to invent windows....nuts.

The world is clearly moving at different speeds for it's various inhabitants.


Battistella
 
It seems like Sony believes if you repeat it enough, it becomes true. Which sadly, can be a winning formula. However, in this saturated digital age, I'm confident savvy consumers will continue to know the truth.

Besides, proof is in the pudding. F55 is 4K. Dragon is 6K. Dragon is already a generation (or two) ahead.

But this IS amusing!
 
You know, a few years ago (2, maybe 3) I saw a Taylor Swift music video shown in a movie theater, presented by Sony, when they claimed that this was the first Music video shot in 4K. I started laughing out loud, couldn't help it, and people thought I had a weird sense of humor.
Sony has been trying to hijack "The creation of 4K" for quite a while, and you know, when a lie gets repeated enough, it sure will become truth for those who don't know better.

Dan is correct, again.
 
Come on guys - no one "invented" 4K. It was the next technological progression like a Gigabyte was to the Megabyte or a CD to the Floppy. It's so funny to hear all this fuss - reminds me of Columbus "discovering" American. I mean did the man ever even land in the USA during his failed attempts to find trade routes to Asia? Most of what you think you know is children's stories and mythology

Every time I use a piece of high technology gear I'm usually frustrated by it from a design/use perspective - while knowing it's the best we can do right now. My brand new iPhone 6+ is a blunt instrument that is a bundle of compromises and missed opportunities. The current movie cameras will give way to devices that are not so constrained by the limitations of physics as we understand them today. I mean a fully loaded movie camera weighs in at what . . . 20lbs? This is not the final destination and no one company is going affect the forward progress to reduce size and cost of technology. It will happen with or without Sony, Arri or RED
 
I got invited to a Sony product night around about 4BR (before Red). There the comment was made that the then F23 offering had better resolution than film. I stuck my bib in and suggested that people who dealt in film might take issue with the comment. The concession was made along the lines that Sony's Cinealta and film post processing at 2K were about the same quality. I haven't been invited to a Sony product night since.
 
It seems like Sony believes if you repeat it enough, it becomes true. Which sadly, can be a winning formula.

Sounds like they've been studying the American political system.

However, in this saturated digital age, I'm confident savvy consumers will continue to know the truth.

Please tell me you're kidding. Things like Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, and countless other narcissism driven entities have made the dissemination of innuendo, rumor, and falsehoods as fact easy, simple, and almost universal. If you really believe that "savvy consumers" go through any trouble whatsoever to seek out "real" truth, you're living on a different planet than I am.

But if we want to stick to the actual facts on this topic, Sony was in fact the first manufacturer to release a practical 4K projection system (and the only one for a number of years). And although Dalsa came up with the first semi-usable 4K digital cinema camera (in 2003), Sony's projector (introduced in 2004) was the first sensible way of actually projecting those images without recording them to film. So they have, in fact, been in the 4K game "from the beginning," if you don't count the camera as the only significant piece of the puzzle. And you shouldn't.
 
Like Red advertised a 4K camera that was actually 3.2k? Or naming Redcode a "raw" codec when it uses compression?

Fair enough... :) My point was not who invented 4k, my point is that I personally found amusing but also annoying this advertising made from the same company that was try to sell me 6 years ago a F35 as the peak of digital market, and, at the same time, claim, again to me and, I suppose, to many other customers, that the 4K was not the future of the digital film. Up now I never get information from Red that the 8k is a scam. I am more then happy and curios to test the new high sensitivity chip from sony, the panasonic varicam 4k, and all the camera that will appear on the market; and I am pretty sure that the prototype of 8K camera that I saw on 2012 from sony will become an awesome tool; I just love to give credit to the company that push all the others to embrace the 4k several years before they wanted to do it. As a costumer I am proud of what WE achieve (without all the support from the buyers and user the visionary idea of Red we will still be in the backyard of Jim Jannard) and to the courage that made Red to bring this technology affordable to everyone. Imagine how much nicer will be a commercial from sony like this "WE WHERE WRONG, we not believe that 4K was ready for the mass market, but we learn from our mistake and we have develop the most advanced set of High end digital product to bring film in your home... " :)
 
Like Red advertised a 4K camera that was actually 3.2k? Or naming Redcode a "raw" codec when it uses compression?

Umm, the RED ONE was 4K in it's R3D form. I never found this disingenuous. And R3D is a "RAW" codec. It's just not UNCOMPRESSED.
 
Like Red advertised a 4K camera that was actually 3.2k? Or naming Redcode a "raw" codec when it uses compression?

The RED One was, is and always will be 4K. It is a simple FACT. And "raw" and "uncompressed" have nothing to do with each other. Get a grip.
 
There is such a thing as lossless compression after all, so compression and raw can go together.... and even if there
is a loss they can still go together.

Perhaps the Dalsa being uncompressed was its downfall.
 
Like Red advertised a 4K camera that was actually 3.2k? Or naming Redcode a "raw" codec when it uses compression?

By the same standard weren't most HD CMOS cameras less than 1080p?

REDCODE is one of the primary reasons RED has succeeded.
 
I never really understood why RED never made it possible to record uncompressed. Sony, as far as I know had the first 4k uncompressed camera, or no?

Not that I do not like the r3d format but well, uncompressed raw is something different.
 
I never really understood why RED never made it possible to record uncompressed. Sony, as far as I know had the first 4k uncompressed camera, or no?

Not that I do not like the r3d format but well, uncompressed raw is something different.

I would venture to say, that side by side, uncompressed raw vs just slightly compressed raw, that no one can
see a difference that matters other than a mosquito noise shift of difference.
 
By the same standard weren't most HD CMOS cameras less than 1080p?

REDCODE is one of the primary reasons RED has succeeded.

Indeed, this is true for consumer cameras and entry level pro cameras. But take for example the F35, which has a 5k sensor that downsamples to true 1080p.
 
Or naming Redcode a "raw" codec when it uses compression?

Roger.
For some reason you continue using terms Raw and Uncompressed as interchangeable. The definition of RAW is to record the sensor data in order to preserve the ability to interpret (debayer) the RAW image at a later point. This allows continued development of better interpretation algorithms, which means, you can use some old R1 recording and using new color science get better results today, then it was possible on the day of the shoot. Compressing just means taking that RAW sensor data and by using compression algorithms to reduce the footprint of the recorded image. Regardless of compression or the lack thereof, the sensor data is then remains available for the new interpretation. The term compressed RAW was used by Red from the very beginning, so I'm not sure where is the confusion.
 
Back
Top