Ketch Rossi
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2007
- Messages
- 15,041
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Sardinia, Italy
- Website
- www.afroditefilms.com
Okay guys, sorry but will not have time to shoot anything till the weekend, but since I got several inquiries on how the 17-50 compares to the 18-50 and how big is really the front element, I made few shot of comparison.
First off, this lens is extremely well build, and the Aperture, Focus and Zoom ring movements are very smooth and pleasingly better, by a lot form the original 18-50, and incredible lens for the price, especially for what you can get a used one now, but the 17-50 is in a world of its own, just like the 18-85.
While the front element is quite wide, I still see some serious applications for S3D shooting with even a Beam Splitter, were a ring adjustment can be used to fit in the actual Lens element an effectively closing out any incoming light were the front outer construction might not allow to enter the usual Lens opening, on the S3D rigs, which is much smaller Diameter.
But what I can say for sure is that the 17-50, this little Beauty, will be no doubt my Primary Travel lens on my Personal Epic-X!!
First off, this lens is extremely well build, and the Aperture, Focus and Zoom ring movements are very smooth and pleasingly better, by a lot form the original 18-50, and incredible lens for the price, especially for what you can get a used one now, but the 17-50 is in a world of its own, just like the 18-85.
While the front element is quite wide, I still see some serious applications for S3D shooting with even a Beam Splitter, were a ring adjustment can be used to fit in the actual Lens element an effectively closing out any incoming light were the front outer construction might not allow to enter the usual Lens opening, on the S3D rigs, which is much smaller Diameter.
But what I can say for sure is that the 17-50, this little Beauty, will be no doubt my Primary Travel lens on my Personal Epic-X!!