ISO 4000...

[Ikemedia]

Looks great guys,

I'm looking forward to ISO 800.

 

[albert rudnicki]

I for one would love some news about your ff35. It's been almost a year...
I'll try please

 

[Mohammed El Sharqawy]

Brook... nothing personal. I did the same thing to someone else on the ISO, ISO thread.

It looks like we do pretty well now against the competition at high ISO. Our true advantages go beyond that... we hope. Our goal was to take High ISO out of the discussion so other things could be focused on... like RAW, high frame rate RAW, etc.

Jim

you keep on saying that a lot.. RAW and nothing comes close.. rendering non-raw out of competition.. we all know that raw is the best way.. others are making good advancement for a certain amount of money..

 

[Sanjin Jukic]

The M-X upgrades to RED ONE will begin before we ship any EPICs or Scarlets.

Jim

Great idea!!! :hurray::hurray::hurray:


Also this looks exactly as a kind of STAGE FIVE that I suggested before!!!???.

 

[Alex Atkinson]

wicked. can't wait to touch.:drool5:

 

[Axel Mertes]

ISO 16,000 - now we are really talking. What are you going to use for that? a single christmas tree light?

Hehe, finally we can avoid lighting cost in total :crazy:?

First time we will be able to shoot space war movies out there in space, still capturing the low light of the twinkling stars :smilielol5:

Honestly, ISO 16000 is rather artificial, but being able to see something at such rates means the camera has a lot of headroom and dynamic range. Thats important ot all of us!

Jim & Co., keep it rolling!

 

[Tim Whitcomb]

Sanjin rules!

M-X Sensor Upgrade sounds AAWESOME!

Thanks RED Team

 

[Cüneyt Kaya]

sanjin, will you be allowed to make a m-x upgrade? if so, congrats.

 

[Jesse Johnson]

2.2k MOV:

http://red.cachefly.net/2.2k.mov

In the words of Frank Barone... "HOLY CRAP!"

Awesome job as usual guys! I can't wait to order my Scarlet and Epic modules!

 

[JanneJansson]

The M-X upgrades to RED ONE will begin before we ship any EPICs or Scarlets.

Jim

Whooooooo hooooooooo arty:

 

[Eric Haase]

This question will come down to personal taste. As of today (and Graeme, Deanan and Rob aren't done yet), I don't see thinking about the NR "sauce" until after ISO 1640-2000 for properly exposed daylight shots. Whatever you choose as your threshold, tungsten will likely need the "sauce" about a stop or so sooner.

Next week I'll do a low light test to ISO 16,000 and see what happens. I've learned my lesson not to use studio lighting for high ISO examples...

Jim

For me it is rare that I need a high ISO (which for me means low light sensitivity) with daylight sources. Most of my night interiors, studio work, and night exteriors are lit with tungsten sources, or a mix. A lot of times I've got existing practicals and fixtures that I'm balancing to and most of the time they are tungsten. If I do use daylight sources on night work I don't correct for them or only correct halfway and almost always there is a mix with tungsten. The practical usage of high ISO for me is low light tungsten situations. I'm looking forward to seeing what MX can do at high ISO under tungsten.

 

[Álex Montoya]

Give me a nice ISO1000 with Tungsten and I'm happy.

 

[Ryan E. Walters]

For me it is rare that I need a high ISO (which for me means low light sensitivity) with daylight sources. Most of my night interiors, studio work, and night exteriors are lit with tungsten sources, or a mix. A lot of times I've got existing practicals and fixtures that I'm balancing to and most of the time they are tungsten. If I do use daylight sources on night work I don't correct for them or only correct halfway and almost always there is a mix with tungsten. The practical usage of high ISO for me is low light tungsten situations. I'm looking forward to seeing what MX can do at high ISO under tungsten.

Great points, and very true. This can be compounded even more if you have ot shoot an exterior with little added light- those street lights are often well below 3200k. Even still, if a usable image is to be had from ISO 1000 - 2000, I would be very impressed, as right now there is way to much noise in those images for my liking.

 

[PaulClements]

ISO 4000? For real... Hmm, nice. Very nice.
Thanks for posting as a quicktime. Far more revealing than an image. Great stuff.

Paul

 

[Brent J. Craig]

I love that you did the test using the light from an iPhone. There's a light source that just about any of us can recreate!

 

[Brent J. Craig]

...No bolting stuff to stuff to an adapter to stuff to some velcro to stuff to make a camera package. Like this.

Ahhhhh! It's Franken-camera. Run for your lives! :zombie_smiley:

 

[TATOU]

Crazy but what about the dynamic level?

 

[Matthew Bennett]

That looks like pretty spectacular sensitivity and processing.

I guess the next request would be some lovely detailed and luminous night views.

 

[Tom Lowe]

My request would be for a simple ISO 1600 sunset.

 

[brian hanson]

amazing, can't wait to shoot with that.