Ralph Wong
Well-known member
Just got my camera two months ago, and I'm part of the group that's a little pissed. When I initially heard about Scarlet, the rumors had it being only a 2/3" sensor with a fixed lens. I felt I wanted at least a 35mm sized sensor with interchangeable lenses, so forking over the $17,500 was worth it for the added features. Now, it looks like the Scarlet WILL be a superior camera to the RED one at half the price! Everybody keeps saying that technology always moves forward and we should expect this. Look at the iPhone that went from $600 to $200 in the course of a year (and the $200 phone is better). The problem with this argument is that when you take a loss on smaller purchases like an iPhone or a computer, you may lose a couple of hundred dollars in value over the course of a year. If the Scarlet sells for around $15,000 with necessary accessories, current RED buyers will lose around $10,000 in the course of a year. It makes me wonder who would want to buy a RED One at this point unless they really needed to shoot something now. And for the people who wonder why I bought the camera if I didn't need to shoot something now, it's because RED told me I had to or I would lose my reservation number and credit for accessories.