Combat/Reality Frame Rate

[Ryan Patch]

this post just poped to the top of my list, and I didn't see it before. MAN that stuff is great, man! Love it!

If you ever need another cam op in the middle east... hell, in the us... call me up.

 

[Stephen Williams]

24 or 23.976?

Hi,

Shoot 24, edit 24, don't worry about NTSC TV that requires 23.967 it's not relevant in the 21st centuary.

Stephen

 

[Steve Sherrick]

Hi,

Shoot 24, edit 24, don't worry about NTSC TV that requires 23.967 it's not relevant in the 21st centuary.

Stephen

23.976 is still very relevant. It's what I deal with all day long.

 

[Richard Goodwin]

I love what you are doing and am excited to see more in the future.

Concerning the frame rate I just find that ~24fps treats people subjects well. Human motion tends to look jerky at higher frame rates. Ultimately to me what you are doing is about Human Effort and Sacrifice. So, a frame rate that is based on that seems like a good idea to me.

Technically, other than the issue of distribution I don't see a right or a wrong. The idea that somehow a Video frame rate is more modern seems a very short term view; esp. as the RED is more of a return to Cinema than an extension of video.

 

[Stephen Williams]

23.976 is still very relevant. It's what I deal with all day long.

Hi,

But only because you are using legacy NTSC equipment, time to move on I think....

Stephen