Jannard
Red Leader
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2006
- Messages
- 8,248
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 0
Dynamic Range is tricky to measure. And everyone seems to use a different method. At the end of the day, what matters is what the image looks like. Is there information in the highlights and in the shadows? How much resolution is there? Does the image "feel" right? Does the image seem "over-sharpened"? How far can you push the exposure and maintain a clean image? How is the color fidelity? The net result of all of these questions gives a more accurate description of image quality.
I wouldn't get hung up on absolute dynamic range numbers any more than I would worry if 4k bayer is really 4k. Some companies sacrifice the total image quality to score higher on some specific test.
We have just posted a test from ISO 8000. I'm not sure any other company has been brave enough to do that. That is 5 stops under-exposed. Tomorrow we shoot for 6... ISO 16000. In any event, we are very proud of the resolution, color, feel and elasticity of our image. And remember, we record to Compact Flash.
Jim
I wouldn't get hung up on absolute dynamic range numbers any more than I would worry if 4k bayer is really 4k. Some companies sacrifice the total image quality to score higher on some specific test.
We have just posted a test from ISO 8000. I'm not sure any other company has been brave enough to do that. That is 5 stops under-exposed. Tomorrow we shoot for 6... ISO 16000. In any event, we are very proud of the resolution, color, feel and elasticity of our image. And remember, we record to Compact Flash.
Jim