Iso 8000...

[Jannard]

This is ISO 8000 and 180 degree shutter (not 360) shot under tungsten light (the most difficult). We think we can still do better, but this is pretty amazing stuff. Shot with RED 18-50mm T3 zoom on "Acapulco".

Jim

... spots on the right is paint splatter on a piece of aluminum. I didn't want to alter the image, so we left them in the shot.

 

[Casey Green]

wow, impressive! - thanks for posting the actual image, Jim.

 

[Charles Perkins]

your joking right?

AWESOME!!!

 

[Alex Wengert]

Interesting Jim. I'm assuming that this is shot wide open on the lens.

 

[Keith Nealy]

Wow...
Things just keep on getting better.

 

[Keith Nealy]

Jim, was this image adjusted in post?

Like you said previously, "lifted out of the dirt?"

 

[Jannard]

Interesting Jim. I'm assuming that this is shot wide open on the lens.

No. It was exposed for ISO 8000 (f22). Normal exposure at ISO 250 was T4.

Jim

 

[sandesh]

Amazing!

 

[Jannard]

Jim, was this image adjusted in post?

Like you said previously, "lifted out of the dirt?"

Yes... and we used a spoon, not a shovel.

Jim

 

[Finner]

The noise at 8000 gives it an almost super16 kind of look. I wonder if the 4000 gives a bit of a 35mm look.

 

[Joe Aurili]

Wow, that is quite nice considering. It is sized a little below 720p so 8000 might be a stretch for pro work

 

[canred]

What did it look like before post? Another question is what did the 4000 image look like before and after?

Tom

 

[Rainer Fritz]

I can only say congrates to you and the team... sending you kisses my dears...

 

[Jarred Land]

Wow, that is quite nice considering. It is sized a little below 720p so 8000 might be a stretch for pro work

this is scaled down from the original 4k image, it was not shot at in 720. and remember, this is a jpg.

 

[Casey Green]

no noticeable FPN either from what I can tell when zooming in. :biggrin:

 

[Harmonica]

Holy cow. My digital still camera (albeit a cheap one, I happen to be saving up for a digital cinema camera...) has twice as much noise under ideal conditions!

 

[Adam Jeal]

Jim & Jarred,

This is amazing! - It's made my day. I'll never shoot S16 or 35 again! hmy:

Thanks! :biggrin:

 

[Brook Willard]

This is absurd... I haven't seen it on a computer monitor yet (I'm on my phone), but damn. How on earth did you guys build this sensor?

I'm loving these updates as of late.

 

[Joe Aurili]

Understood, I was thinking of what it would be like shooting at a high ISO and scalling down to 720p to eliminate noise. Good point on the JPG. It looks like a shot from my Z1, but the Z1 had much more light to work with.

this is scaled down from the original 4k image, it was not shot at in 720. and remember, this is a jpg.

 

[Adam Jeal]

This is absurd... I haven't seen it on a computer monitor yet (I'm on my phone), but damn. How on earth did you guys build this sensor?

I'm loving these updates as of late.

Graeme's 'magic pixies' did it Brook! Bless them!