Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Titanium...

All context aside -- we have obviously thrown it out the window at this point. The original statement made about titanium and tap water was misleading. It is analogous to saying, "OMG! We can't use steel for a mount because it rusts when exposed to tap water!"

Like steel, there are a multitude to titanium alloys, some of them fall into the realm of "stainless" and corrosion resistant -- US military and aviation spec CRES rating territory. Titanium still remains as one of the most corrosion-resistant elements known. If you want a truly corrosion-free mount and camera body for your Epic, give RED a call and see if they can make you a special one out of an 8K gold with 440C stainless steel mix. It still would be a bit soft for the mount I think, but damn that camera body would shine and would never tarnish, rust or corrode, ever. Have them cut the buttons out of diamonds while we're at it and have the lenses coated with micro-form sapphire crystals.

As I am trained as a journalist, it is important to note here that my policy of posting information on RedUser is to verify any claim that I make using more than one source. Having said that, these threads are discussions and should be viewed in the context of a casual conversation. Highly technical data, information regarding very specific characteristics of metallurgy, for example, should of course be vetted thoroughly before anyone takes it as absolute truth. I expect that anything I post will be subjected to intense scrutiny-- I subject other RedUsers posts to detailed scrutiny.

It's good to see you have some backup for your statement. However, there are a multitude of titanium alloys and compounds. Not as many out there as steel variants, but quite numerous. Some are susceptible to certain types of corrosion, others are not but at the same time vulnerable to other types. Re: sources. I have access to your #1 and #2. #1 has a lot of info and still does not even begin to dig into a fraction of all the possible alloy compounds. #2 only talks about one alloy -- Titanium with 6% aluminum and 4% vanadium and, yep, it corrodes a bit. Not much more than than most common forms of stainless steel will under the same conditions if you really want to analyze it. Here are two good data sheets for Ti-6Al-4V. FWIW, most of the "stainless" or CRES rated Ti alloys are not transitional alloys such as this, but are beta stage alloys. Often containing Chromium, Zirconium, Molybdenum and even gold. Titanium loves to combine with hydrogen and it can be a problem in certain production methods, one of the worst being cooling welds and it's often considered better to cool welding of titanium with certain types of oils as opposed to using water. Titanium likes to combine with hydrogen loosely, which actually makes it ideal for some applications -- such as hydride mixture and hydrogen storage industries.

ti-6al-4v:
http://asm.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=MTP641
http://cartech.ides.com/datasheet.aspx?i=101&E=269

Tap water is indeed highly corrosive and has cumulative effects on aluminum and stainless steel as well. Fluoride, chlorine, copper, sodium, etc.. are all commonly found -- often as specific additives -- in tap water.

Talking about the SR-71 is a specialized case. I don't believe Lockheed or the USAF has ever made it public as to which alloys were specifically used for structural components or the titanium skin. If I'm not mistaken, the skin has high percentages of molybdenum and chromium, relative to more commonly used alloys. We also have to sprinkle it with a good amount of military paranoia -- someone points out a potential issue and they take their efforts to the nines in avoiding it. Lockheed chose titanium not only for its strength to weight ratio, but also its resiliency to corrosion. Many surfaces on the SR-71 take super-sonic impact from raindrops and cloud moisture during flight and instantly boil / vaporize this water (complete with impurities) on contact. Rain water is hardly pure and in many cases is just as impure and corrosive as common tap water, or more so as it often has high concentrations of sulfer, carbon dioxide and even ammonia compounds.

In discussions on materials science, we really should start off with what is the exact material or alloy to avoid these needless de-railments of the threads

Of course. And we don't know what RED has chosen. Off the top of my head, there are a couple common alloys I would consider using. And a few of them are completely inert in common tap-water, even over time, as they are inert to chlorine, bromides, sulfur and sodium compounds.

The point is, we have to look at individual alloy compounds. Many titanium alloy components for SCUBA gear are made from TI-8Al-3V-3Cr for clips and buckles, dive computer and watch housings. TI-2C-3Fe-4Cr-6V is a common one for dive knives as it is even more resistant and holds an edge. It can be polished and looks almost like silver when it is, you'll find it on watch bezels sometimes, but it's very hard to work with and it can be heat-tempered or cold-tempered for hardening.

There are lots of undocumented Ti alloys out there, lots of research currently going on in this area as Titanium is becoming more and more viable for use in precision milling applications and metal fabrication. I know of one manufacturer that is trying to bring to market a titanium alloy to replace certain types of common sheet-metal used for roofing and gutters. It's an alloy made of about 35% titanium.

Titanium and most of its common alloys are one of the few metals that can have corrosive properties altered through molecular alignment or tempering.
Lockheed observed over the service of the SR-71 that the titanium skin would continue to harden from the high heat it was exposed to during supersonic flight and after enough time, it became difficult to even get their intended paints and coatings to adhere to the skin.
 
Last edited:
"Whattya reading?"
4623626180_b7548e7aa9_o.jpg


"Book about metals."
4623020289_11005e1b9c_o.jpg


"Stress fractures in titanium."
4623626862_565b24ff97_o.jpg

LOL!
 
Somewhat responsible for a derailment? With all due respect, this thread was about the lens mount. Your post jumped topics to the EPIC body and left the titanium PL mount in the dust.

In all fairness Brian, I wasn't the one who brought up the idea of Titanium bodies. My first post on this thread was in response to that idea.

BTW, my father would laugh his ass off at your "fatherly advice" about digging holes. As you may have guessed, I'm not good at following Fathers' advice. LOL!
 
My theory in all this is that RED has absolutely no clue about materials technology and just happened upon a chunk of titanium in the parking lot. They figured "what the hell..." and milled it into a lens mount; probably because they didn't have enough to do a whole camera body.

:yikes:
 
Hehe... I must have had it all wrong. I figured Jim needed time off to recover after allowing himself to be abducted by aliens... again. I'm glad he was able to escape once more with some of their technology.
 
Hehe... I must have had it all wrong. I figured Jim needed time off to recover after allowing himself to be abducted by aliens... again. I'm glad he was able to escape once more with some of their technology.

Jeff - you are a genius. Of course that is what happened; aliens!! That explains everything. Now let's just make sure we keep a close eye on Jim in case he starts to mount an effort to take over the world. :eek: Or maybe that's what this RED thing has been about all along.
 
My theory in all this is that RED has absolutely no clue about materials technology and just happened upon a chunk of titanium in the parking lot. They figured "what the hell..." and milled it into a lens mount; probably because they didn't have enough to do a whole camera body.

:yikes:

BRILLIANT!!!

Actually I also heard they found their ASIC for Epic in the wreckage of something over in Area 51. It's not a bug, they're trying to disable function #21 which records 10.495 days IN THE FUTURE at an ISO of 34,000 ASA. Keeps causing huge exposure issues.

Sorry, but this thread is going through the eye of a camel's needle.
 
BRILLIANT!!!

Actually I also heard they found their ASIC for Epic in the wreckage of something over in Area 51. It's not a bug, they're trying to disable function #21 which records 10.495 days IN THE FUTURE at an ISO of 34,000 ASA. Keeps causing huge exposure issues.

Sorry, but this thread is going through the eye of a camel's needle.



Yeah, yeah, yeah. I know that makes no sense whatsoever.
 
I hope that's not a titanium needle... It would cost 18x more and erode in harsh sunlight. Or something...:laugh:
 
Cameras and titanium have a time tested and very successful history.

I have two of these bodies, and I cannot say enough about them. :thumbsup:

20103916121.jpg


This quote can be found on many Nikon websites.

"... Titanium, so strong it's used for jet engines and missiles, yet so light it weighs less than steel, titanium ranks high on the list of the most effective materials for industrial purposes. Certainly few other metals stand up so well to such extremes of stress, corrosion and heat. Yet the mere shaping of titanium can be so difficult and costly, only the most meticulous manufacturers deem the effort worthwhile ..."
 
Still think they should build the bodies and mounts out of ceramic tiles. They could buy them as govt surplus from NASA as soon as the shuttle stops flying. Those things can take the cold of space and the heat of re-entry, and would cost about .02 on the dollar:patriot:

edit: and you might get a NASA rocket scientist along with the tiles!:w00t:
 
I think the x18 is for the mount only. Like if the value of the mount is $500 then it will be $9000 more.... which is .... hmm...hmmmm...hmm... quite expensive...

The price of the material is about $20. It is the manufacturing cost that is higher, about 2...3 times higher than anodised aluminium.
 
Still think they should build the bodies and mounts out of ceramic tiles...

Ceramics are brittle and nowhere near as strong as Titanium alloy. They are affected by moisture and thermal expansion. Cool, yes, but not very useful. :frown2:
 
Come on Jeff, you didn't say that there is some strange peculiarity w/ Ti that makes it reactive to fluorinated/chlorinated drinking water :drool5:. You said it reacts easily with other compounds.

Please don't try to bullshit your way out of this b/c you're a trained journalist or can quote a material data sheet or name drop the SR-71 Blackbird (which by all accounts in one cool plane :thumbsup:).

You were quite simply talking out of your ass (as probably every one of us has done at sometime or another on a internet forum) and got busted. Fess up! :emote_whack::beatdeadhorse5::hurray:

Sorry, Pete, but my research into Titanium has led me to those very conclusions. Pure Titanium does react with compounds easily-- its the very reason for its stability when used as a structural component. Titanium reacts easily with oxygen to produce a layer of Titanium oxide which protects it from corrosion and reacting to other compounds-- however that layer can be stripped away through abrasion and or exposure to heat. This can happen in fabrication of milled or cast parts and its why this work is best done in an inert gas atmosphere.

Once the Titanium oxide layer is gone, Titanium is vulnerable to corrosion (surface pitting and stress fracture propagation) if it is exposed to such compounds as skin oils or the flouride and chlorine that is present in tap water. In the case of the SR-71, the aircraft was routinely exposed to high-temperatures while traveling at beyond mach 3. This constant exposure to heat (apparently) compromised the formation of Titanium oxide, making the plane vulnerable to cleaning agents other than pressurized distilled water.

Titanium mixes and reacts to other compounds so well, its typically not found in its pure form in nature, so it has to be refined in order to be used in Titanium alloys for industry and manufacturing-- another reason its so expensive. While you can have a titanium body for your camera, like the above mentioned (and very cool) Nikon, its best to protect the raw metal with a surface treatment like paint or electroplating. Even then, do you really need to use such a costly mission-critical material like titanium when aluminum will do just fine?

BTW, if we can't even get people's real names on this forum, how do you expect us to enforce basic journalistic integrity in their posts?
 
Pure Titanium does react with compounds easily-- its the very reason for its stability when used as a structural component. Titanium reacts easily with oxygen to produce a layer of Titanium oxide which protects it from corrosion and reacting to other compounds--

So far, so good.


however that layer can be stripped away through abrasion and or exposure to heat. This can happen in fabrication of milled or cast parts and its why this work is best done in an inert gas atmosphere.

Now, as a "journalist", you should state whether this is a manufacturing concern or an end user concern. If you (Jeff) are questioning the ability of RED to know about material characteristics and how to work with them, then address it as such. While an inert atmosphere may be desirable in some manufacturing processes (such as when the Russians were welding titanium submarine hulls) - I do not share your concern . I believe that I can trust that RED will maintain proper QC throughout the process.
Jim has demonstrated that quality in the product his team delivers is paramount.


Once the Titanium oxide layer is gone, Titanium is vulnerable to corrosion (surface pitting and stress fracture propagation) if it is exposed to such compounds as skin oils or the flouride and chlorine that is present in tap water.

Why this does not belong in this discussion: As soon as the titanium is exposed to an oxygen molecule, the oxide layer reforms. Since the majority of people using RED cameras are likely to be filming somewhere on this planet, the chances of exposing the camera to the air we breathe should be considered a given.


In the case of the SR-71, the aircraft was routinely exposed to high-temperatures while traveling at beyond mach 3. This constant exposure to heat (apparently) compromised the formation of Titanium oxide, making the plane vulnerable to cleaning agents other than pressurized distilled water.

Why this is irrevelant in this discussion: If an EPIC camera were to be exposed to the temperature extremes noted, the titanum would likely survive better than most other parts of the camera. For example, vulnerability of the optics, circuit boards, wiring insulation, media, you name it. Should you really be concerned about what type of water you might use to clean the lens mount when the rest of the system has been exposed to these extremes?


Titanium mixes and reacts to other compounds so well, its typically not found in its pure form in nature, so it has to be refined in order to be used in Titanium alloys for industry and manufacturing-- another reason its so expensive.

As far as saying that titanium is "typically not found in its pure form in nature" - please consider that very few materials found in their pure form in nature are used without refining. Does aluminum or steel come direct from a quarry? Simple answer: No. There are many steps in the refining process with many opportunities for something to go wrong. Consider how many alloys are out there; each is picked for it's characteristics and its intended end use.


While you can have a titanium body for your camera, like the above mentioned (and very cool) Nikon, its best to protect the raw metal with a surface treatment like paint or electroplating.

Are you sure that this is the reason Nikon used a surface treatment? Would not paint chip or wear down (how many camera bodies have I worn portions down to expose the brass beneath...)
In most cases, the material coating is cosmetic - in line with "corporate marketing standards" (very hard to read the Nikon name when it is only etched) It's called packaging. Oh, and an anti-reflective coating has benefits as well.


Even then, do you really need to use such a costly mission-critical material like titanium when aluminum will do just fine?

Please read the thread from the beginning - for some people - YES - There are cases where the thermal expansion of an aluminum lens mount may be an issue - while this may be only a small percentage of users, this OPTIONAL UPGRADE may be for them. Or perhaps the OPTIONAL steel PL mount would suffice.
This is the RED USER site - Think of the offering of a Titanium mount as a choice - just as someone may prefer a Master Prime to shoot a scene, someone else may prefer a Cooke. It is all about choice.

Unfortunately, when the offering of a choice or upgrade provides the fertilizer for delusional tangents that you have somehow latched onto, it ends up being a distraction to the community at large.


BTW, if we can't even get people's real names on this forum, how do you expect us to enforce basic journalistic integrity in their posts

When a self-proclaimed "journalist" ignores repeated criticism about the content of their articles from numerous knowledgeable people, how can we expect them to know what the word "integrity" means to this community?
 
Hey guys, it's starting to get a little too personal. Brian, your points are valid, but perhaps a bit too directed. Jeff, you do realize that everything you stated in post #181, with the exception of the tidbit on the SR-71, is equally applicable to aluminum, right? And Brian is correct, most surface treatments are cosmetic.
 
Back
Top