Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Zeiss DSLR TEST

Jim Cummings

Jim Cummings

Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
San Francisco
Website
www.sanfrancisco3dfilms.com
Fellow REDheads,

This is a lens test for the newest ZF Zeiss primes sent from the CEO himself for testing with the 5D for an article in Indieslate Magazine by Robert Harrison. I thought I might swing by and shoot a bit with them on the RED.
They are the sharpest lenses I have ever shot with.

Build 30, before the MX upgrade.
TEST:
**********************
http://vimeo.com/9196516
**********************

Jim Cummings
San Francisco
www.jimmycthatsme.com
 
Evin Grant said:
Compared to what? The ZF line is pretty good but compared to Zeiss's own Master Primes, the Leica C primes or even the Optimo zooms they do not hold up as well.
Click to expand...

I am interested to know about Zeiss cine standard speed vs Zeiss ZF.

Did you a/b them ?

Antoine
 
Yes, the ZFs obviously have more coverage (Full Frame 35 still), but the faster 1.4 lenses do not perform as well till f2 or f2.8. The 28mm is actually the same optical formula for both. The only real disadvantage to the Standards is portholing, which is a darkening of the edges of the frame because of steep light angles. This issue is only really present in the 12, 16, 24 and 32mm lenses and is gone by f2.8.

Obviously the Standard Speeds are cine lenses with T stops and real focus scales which is a huge advantage for critical focus pulling and time sensitive productions.

My personal opinion though is that the ZFs although very nice are not noticeably sharper than the equivalent condition Nikon AIS still primes for a much higher premium. Also the AIS 85mm f1.4 Nikkor is definately a superior lens to the Zeiss 85 wide open at least in my limited comparisons.
 
Evin Grant said:
My personal opinion though is that the ZFs although very nice are not noticeably sharper than the equivalent condition Nikon AIS still primes for a much higher premium. Also the AIS 85mm f1.4 Nikkor is definately a superior lens to the Zeiss 85 wide open at least in my limited comparisons.
Click to expand...

I find that pretty interesting ... I've been researching, shooting with and collecting old nikon manual primes for the past 18 months. I love their feel and sharpness and even though there are some sucky duds (like the 24/2 which I've managed to avoid) I'm more than happy with my current set (24/2.8, 35/1.4, 50/1.4, 50-135/3.5).
I know my opinion may not count for much but I recently moved over to one particular efs zoom because would you believe it, I found it even sharper than those nikons. 17-55/2.8.
 
@ the OP... Were they really the ZF primes and not the ZE primes? Same thing you know, but the ZE version is the Canon mount version and focus rings turn the opposite direction (vs. Nikon version). Then again, I've known plenty of people who buy ZF's and then use flimsy adapters, that can't guaranty infinity focus, to mount them to their 7D or 5D2... WTF...? I didn't go hunt down the cited article. I just always wonder that when people talk about using ZF's with their Canon cameras.

As for Evin's comments, I have to agree. And the Nikon 85mm F1.4 AIS is one seriously sweet lens.
 
yes I hated the 24 f2, couldn't get rid of it fast enough.

edit:
I'm really pleased with the 24 f2.8 that I currently shoot with, I'll keep a look out for the lens u mentioned too
 
I prefer more zooms than primes for my run & gun style of shooting.

Nikon 14-24mm G f/2.8 and Leica Vario Elmarit-R 28-90mm f/2.8-4.0 both fit in that need pretty good.

Also both are FF35, very sharp, great contrast, lightweight and even their rendering can color match.

Nikon14-24mm_crop.jpg

Shot on 7D with Nikon 14-24mm G f/2.8 @ 2.8 & 24mm (crop), adapter no any color adjustment, used with Novoflex Nikon G to EOS adapter.

Leica28-90mm_crop.jpg

Shot on 7D with Leica Vario Elmarit-R 28-90mm f/2.8-4.0 @ /2.8 & 28mm (crop), no any color adjustment, used with Novoflex Leica R to EOS adapter.

Together with Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 I do have a range of 1:10 (8mm to 90mm) with those three zooms in my backpack.

Still considering a fast prime set between

Leica M (Summilux 21mm, 24mm, 35mm, 50mm f/1.4 & Noctilux 50mm f/0.95 with price about 25.000 Euro !!!!

or

Nikon G set (24mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm @ f/1.4) with price about 5500 Euro !!!

Also using Leica M on Epic or Scarlet would require a custom build Leica M mount that blowing costs even higher.
 
Jim Cummings said:
Fellow REDheads,
They are the sharpest lenses I have ever shot with.

Build 30, before the MX upgrade.
TEST:
**********************
http://vimeo.com/9196516
**********************

Jim Cummings
San Francisco
www.jimmycthatsme.com
Click to expand...

meh... give me a softer lens and a 'sharp' / high res sensor... I think that's the formula. IMO, super sharp lens on the Red is just to much... but that's totally subjective.
 
Michael Totten said:
meh... give me a softer lens and a 'sharp' / high res sensor... I think that's the formula. IMO, super sharp lens on the Red is just to much... but that's totally subjective.
Click to expand...

I totally agree...
 
I've always had my opinion regarding sharpness of lenses which is I would always want the sharpest lens possible and retain the option of dialing down the sharpness with filters or nets. If you start with a soft lens, then your limited to the lack of sharpness of that lens. Starting sharper just gives the user more options I suppose. A proverbial blank canvas. However... I do love the look of vintage glass like Super Baltars and old Panchros. Mmmmmm sooooft.
 
What amazes me is that there are some lenses that have as much resolving power than a super sharp lense, but does have a very nice and organic "diffusion".

ex: ZFs are SUPER sharp lenses, almost clinical perfection.
On the other hand, Cooke's and old Canon FDs have plenty of detail reproduction, but definitively have a "diffusion" (a lack of a better word), a unique and pleasant feel to them.

But again, it may have to do only with how the the sensor reacts.

The RED sensor LOVES the old Canon FDs.

Antoine
 
thats why i have my sharp zeiss lenses..
and soter cinematic kowas


now days you almost have to do in camera stuff.. like use softer lenses..

or else the editor might change your look up on you.. and give you a sharp image in post, when you want a soft
 
On a side note, how do Nikon mount lenses go on the Red? I have only ever shot with PL glass but am looking to buy when the Scarlet arrives and prob can't afford PL's of my own.

Is there any wobble or movement in the mounting when pulling focus? Is the fact that the Nikon mount is not a "positive locking" system causing anyone any issues?
 
Jonathan Burton said:
On a side note, how do Nikon mount lenses go on the Red? I have only ever shot with PL glass but am looking to buy when the Scarlet arrives and prob can't afford PL's of my own.

Is there any wobble or movement in the mounting when pulling focus? Is the fact that the Nikon mount is not a "positive locking" system causing anyone any issues?
Click to expand...

No wobble if you use Optiteks nikon mount. See here: http://www.optitek.org/nikon-prolock.php
 
Jim Cummings said:
Fellow REDheads,

This is a lens test for the newest ZF Zeiss primes sent from the CEO himself for testing with the 5D for an article in Indieslate Magazine by Robert Harrison. I thought I might swing by and shoot a bit with them on the RED.
They are the sharpest lenses I have ever shot with.
Click to expand...

I have seen this video somewhare long back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top