Blair S. Paulsen
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2006
- Messages
- 5,503
- Reaction score
- 34
- Points
- 48
- Location
- San Diego, CA
- Website
- www.alacritymedia.com
I carry a Schneider DigiCon filter for specific situations (open midday sun with contrasty wardrobe and mixed skin tones for example), but would rather not have to "restore" the contrast during post the rest of the time. My guess is that Arri "fixes" the contrast in the decode before anyone sees the image so its mostly a free lunch from the users standpoint. Yes, I am sure they are giving something away but engineering is always filled with compromises and, however they are doing it, the Alexa makes beautiful images.
FWIW I think RED's approach of RAW high resolution with HDRx™ has much more potential and as the Epic matures (which it apparently is already doing during the current alpha program) it will exceed the empirical metrics like DR, S/N ratio, etc of the Alexa. That said, like Kodak vs Fuji, many DPs may select one or the other to make it simpler to get the specific look and feel they desire. Ultimately, I see this camera testing paradigm we all know and often criticize as becoming less relevant without looking much more deeply at the processing of the image in post (virtual telecine if you prefer).
Steve mentioned that they were looking at the ACES standard in some manner in dealing with the footage which is very exciting. As long as 10bit log DPX is the common target for comparison there is a fundamental bias built in. Not to get on a soapbox here, but with so many different topologies for acquiring images and so many ways to view them the best way I am aware of to make comparisons of reasonable validity is IIF/ACES - otherwise the inherent variables can very easily become the only thing being tested. YMMV.
Cheers - #19
FWIW I think RED's approach of RAW high resolution with HDRx™ has much more potential and as the Epic matures (which it apparently is already doing during the current alpha program) it will exceed the empirical metrics like DR, S/N ratio, etc of the Alexa. That said, like Kodak vs Fuji, many DPs may select one or the other to make it simpler to get the specific look and feel they desire. Ultimately, I see this camera testing paradigm we all know and often criticize as becoming less relevant without looking much more deeply at the processing of the image in post (virtual telecine if you prefer).
Steve mentioned that they were looking at the ACES standard in some manner in dealing with the footage which is very exciting. As long as 10bit log DPX is the common target for comparison there is a fundamental bias built in. Not to get on a soapbox here, but with so many different topologies for acquiring images and so many ways to view them the best way I am aware of to make comparisons of reasonable validity is IIF/ACES - otherwise the inherent variables can very easily become the only thing being tested. YMMV.
Cheers - #19