Curran Giddens
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2007
- Messages
- 4,452
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 47
- Location
- Great Barrington, MA
- Website
- www.solarsystemstudio.com
That is very fast indeed!
I'm holding out for a raid array capable of recording the maximum bandwidth of the RAW data port option. I don't need it to be portable like the Codex (the Codex can't record the maximum from the RAW port anyway, AFAIK). I would rather have the capacity of full-size SATA drives anyway. I could also use it for recording from the RAW port, as well as a high-performance online storage system.
What was the minimum bandwidth required for 4.5k@60fps? was it 900MB/sec.? plus overhead, lets say 1GB/sec. Even if you had a raid array capable of 1GB/sec., you still need the right interface.
The HUGE, actually now it is "Ciprico" (doesn't that sound like a antibiotic?) MediaVault 4440 can do 1.5GB/sec.! The 4210 is not too bad either....
http://www.ciprico.com/Products/MediaVault.cfm
I'm holding out for a raid array capable of recording the maximum bandwidth of the RAW data port option. I don't need it to be portable like the Codex (the Codex can't record the maximum from the RAW port anyway, AFAIK). I would rather have the capacity of full-size SATA drives anyway. I could also use it for recording from the RAW port, as well as a high-performance online storage system.
What was the minimum bandwidth required for 4.5k@60fps? was it 900MB/sec.? plus overhead, lets say 1GB/sec. Even if you had a raid array capable of 1GB/sec., you still need the right interface.
The HUGE, actually now it is "Ciprico" (doesn't that sound like a antibiotic?) MediaVault 4440 can do 1.5GB/sec.! The 4210 is not too bad either....
http://www.ciprico.com/Products/MediaVault.cfm