Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Who is using a 300mm lens? And what on earth are you using it for?

I own and use the following long lenses regularly for various genres of production, including sports, nature, commercials, stock footage, etc,:

PL mount:
RED 300 f/2.8
Canon FD 150-600 f/5.6L with Century PL mount conversion

I also have an Optex 2x and a Century 2x that I use with those lenses at times

Nikon Mount:
Nikon 400 f/3.5 AIS
Nikon 50-300 f/4.5 AIS
Nikon 180 f/2.8 AIS (with 2x)

I also have Nikon 1.4x and 2x extenders to use with these lenses when I need them

All of the above RED, Canon, and Nikon lenses have given me excellent long lens results.

I've also used a rented Optimo 24-290 for sports productions, but it is too bulky, heavy, and immobile for most of my long lens work, plus the focal length is quite often too short for what I need. The Optimo 12x weighs 25 pounds, the Canon 150-600 weighs about 9 pounds, the RED 300 about 6 pounds, the Nikon 400 about 4.5 pounds, the Nikon 50-300 weighs about 4 pounds, and the Nikon 180 weighs about 2.5 pounds (with the 2x extender attached).

BTW - I bought my Canon 150-600 from a veteran 35mm film commercial DP/cinematographer who specializes in international and national automotive commercials.

I love working with long lenses for certain genres of work and types of shots. They're a challenge to transport, but the rewards are well worth it.

The tripod I use for all of the lenses above is a Miller Arrow 55 head, with the two different sets of legs I own for it: for real mobile work I use my Miller SOLO 1505 VJ carbon fiber legs, and for more stationary work I often use my Miller alloy single stage legs. For long treks, the Miller 55/Miller SOLO 1505 CF combo weighs just 13.8 pounds and can be carried long distances easily with a shoulder strap.

For mobility and weight considerations, I don't use a matte box or follow focus with any of the above listed lenses (except the Optimo), and all filters I use are screw-in.

Due to the frequent need for mobility with long lenses in their primary uses, IMO the trick is to get lenses with a combination of good optics, reasonable weight, and the option to use screw-in filters. All of my long lenses listed above satisfy those needs.
 
Thanks, Mr. Gibby. . .

Optically, how well does that Nikon 2x converter look on the 180 f2.8 AIS (which I have) compared to the quality I'd get if I bought the Nikon 300mm f2.8 AIS lens? I mean I'd know I'd lose 2 stops of light, but I can't imagine using that much magnification indoors anyway, so losing two stops (where I'd normally have to use use more ND anyway) doesn't seem like such a loss. I'm more concerned about sharpness and distortions I'd experience vis-a-vis the 300mm f2.8 lenses.

Thanks so much!

Stephen
 
Optically, how well does that Nikon 2x converter look on the 180 f2.8 AIS (which I have) compared to the quality I'd get if I bought the Nikon 300mm f2.8 AIS lens? I mean I'd know I'd lose 2 stops of light, but I can't imagine using that much magnification indoors anyway, so losing two stops (where I'd normally have to use use more ND anyway) doesn't seem like such a loss. I'm more concerned about sharpness and distortions I'd experience vis-a-vis the 300mm f2.8 lenses.

Since you own one, as you know, the 180 f/2.8 AIS is an excellent lens - very crisp. I've used my 180 with the Nikon TC-201 2x with good results. Yes, you lose 2 stops, but usually long lens work is in decent natural light. The TC-201 is a good extender, with good glass, and compliments the 180 quite well. In brief tests with that setup I noticed no significant distortions and the sharpness was still very good. Naturally your results could vary depending on the condition of your 180 and the TC-201 you use. Mine are both in excellent condition.

The TC-201 on the 180 would give you a 360mm f/5.6 lens. Most sports and wildlife is shot between f/5.6 and f/11, so that would work. Another way to go, if you need another stop and/or a shorter focal length will do, is to use the Nikon TC-14A 1.4x to make the 180 a 260mm f/4 lens.

I haven't tested the Nikon 300 f/2.8 AIS on RED, but it is an excellent lens. How the 300 would look against the 180 with 2x or 1.4 guy is a good question. My guess is that the 300 would look better (and obviously be faster), but if you can take the hit on speed, the 180 with 2x combo gets you out further (360mm).

Hope this helps...
 
Thank you very much, Steve. . . for once in my life, I decided not to buy the lens ad to just buy the extender (an Adorama demo model) and save some money. As it is, I'm just about out of space in my lens bag, and I'm not sure I could stuff that 300mm lens in anyway.

:-)

I doubt if I'll use it all that much, but I'll probably get $200 out of it. . . and save over $1000 in the bargain!

Thanks again.

Stephen
 
I own the Red 300mm and I've mostly used it for scenic/nature stuff, but I put it on the other day to test on some people and I forgot how much I love the look of it. I'm going to try and bring it out more often, it's a gorgeous lens.
 
red 300mm T2.9/300mm f2.8 LENSES

red 300mm T2.9/300mm f2.8 LENSES

Hi guys,
what is the different between Red 300mm T2.9 RED PRO PRIME and RED 300mm f2.8 LENSES (Technically), thanks
 
If anyone is looking for a cheap 300mm lens in nikon mount, get a nikon 300mm 4.5 ed ais. Although it's slow, it is a great, sharp lens. I picked one up for $300 last year and use it fairly frequently. You do have to be careful about bumping the camera though as every little movement can be seen.
Shane.
 
I don't usually correct on spelling because that would be highly hypocritical of me, but I guess that a non-evasive close-up would be a paparatzee shot taken far enough away that you don't have to run from the angry subject, apposed to a non-invasive close up.

cool beans. I knew what you meant, it just sounded funny.:clown2:

do you mean opposed

:)
 
Back
Top