Where did you get it?)))

[vorob]

I just simply don't understand how did you get red one? It costs 30 000 bucks, I simply can’t imagine such amount of money Canon HF100 (800buk) that’s my limit

 

[Andrew Walker]

Well if you want to play big you got to pay big.

 

[Obin Olson]

just because your scope is small does not mean others are the same as you.

 

[Jeff Kilgroe]

How does a mechanic afford $30~$100K or more for tools? RED is a tool, which can be used to make images. How professional or good looking the images are depends entirely on the person(s) operating the camera and processing the images shot with it.

 

[timdavid]

You get what you pay for

You get what you pay for

I simply can’t imagine such amount of money Canon HF100 (800buk) that’s my limit

So Peter Jackson shoots RED, Vorob shoots HF100 for $800 bucks. How much money do you think a Peter Jackson film brings in? Side note, he has probably triple that amount of money in a set of lenses for his RED One.
Not to mention, RED's real competition costs hundreds of thousands per camera.

This doesn't mean paying a lot for a camera gives you a good film. But people that make good films want good tools that don't get in the way of their craft.

 

[Zakaree Sandberg]

its a business..

how does one buy a McDonald's franchise?
how does one buy a machine shop?

 

[David Mullen ASC]

It's all relative -- compared to a consumer HD camcorder, the RED ONE is expensive, compared to a Sony F35, it's dirt cheap...

But yes, owning professional gear gets expensive. You have to weigh the investment against potential return within a reasonable period of ownership.