Daniel Stilling
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2009
- Messages
- 1,920
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- US, Denmark
- Website
- www.danieldp.com
You are right, I apologize, as my remarks were indeed unnecessarily harsh. Reading it again I realize that it was out of bounds. So again I apologize for my choice of words.
But I do stand by the technical content of what I said. IMHO, when you have little light, stopping down is the absolutely last thing you should do. Even if you are having problems with focus. There are many other ways to fix the issue (focus). You could have changed the shot slightly in a way that it would limit front to back movement. Changed the focal length, putting a wider lens on that has inherently a larger depth of field and brought the camera a little closer.
As you said, I wasn't there, so I don't know exactly what you are up against, but still, the last thing to do on a light starved setup is to close the iris. Just as curiosity. How fast was the lens and how far did you stop it down?
But I do stand by the technical content of what I said. IMHO, when you have little light, stopping down is the absolutely last thing you should do. Even if you are having problems with focus. There are many other ways to fix the issue (focus). You could have changed the shot slightly in a way that it would limit front to back movement. Changed the focal length, putting a wider lens on that has inherently a larger depth of field and brought the camera a little closer.
As you said, I wasn't there, so I don't know exactly what you are up against, but still, the last thing to do on a light starved setup is to close the iris. Just as curiosity. How fast was the lens and how far did you stop it down?
Last edited: