Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

TP2…FCP XML to REDCINE-X

I uploaded TP2 v1.2 & ReLinkTool !

http://www.rklab.net/index/122.html

Ver 1.2 Added
TP2 1.2
*Report window
*clip handle bug fix
*mode2(All Clips to Timeline set IN OUT) output TP2file.

ReLinkTool 1.2
*movie view
*Report window
*mode2(All Clips to Timeline set IN OUT)
Now you can grade Subclips individually.
(audio disabled)
TimeCode have to be matched.
 

Attachments

  • TP2_12.jpg
    TP2_12.jpg
    69.9 KB · Views: 0
  • relink12.jpg
    relink12.jpg
    55.6 KB · Views: 0
Extra footage rendered

Extra footage rendered

Hello,

I am experiencing that whenever I use TP2, the file coming from RC-X is always longer that the original clip.

I usually render out of RCX one long clip, and "slice" it in clips inside FCP after locating it over the original, non-graded footage from where the XML is created.

Once the file is imported, and try to locate it over the timeline, it is always longer, so extra footage is being rendered without asking for handlers.

Any idea of what can potentially be creating this phenomenon?
 
am experiencing that whenever I use TP2, the file coming from RC-X is always longer that the original clip.

Do you use "All Clips to Timeline (Set IN OUT)" mode?
And check "Set IN OUT" and uncheck "Clip Handles"?

Do you use ReLinkTool?

Please save report (check Detail) and E-mail me.

Thank you.
 
Do you use "All Clips to Timeline (Set IN OUT)" mode?
And check "Set IN OUT" and uncheck "Clip Handles"?

Do you use ReLinkTool?

Please save report (check Detail) and E-mail me.

Thank you.

Ryota,

Yes, I am using, "All Clips to Timeline (Set IN OUT)" and IN OUT checked. However, I do not use ReLinkTool. So, what does it really accomplishes? Reconforming?

Please advise,
 
Two problems to resolve

Two problems to resolve

Hello,

I have two problems:

1. When I download the software via your website, after opening the zip file I get version 1.1, not 1.2.

2. When I try to use ReLinkTool (1.1), it asks for a TP2 file. Where can I find it? After I have created the lua file, it does not allow me to save, and a "Waitting" message is shown on the STATUS area (see enclosed snapshot).

View attachment 6610

Please advise,
 
I'm very sorry.
The link was revised.

Please use ver1.2 and if you have any problem, tell me.

*Important notice
Time-remap clip
The different frame rate clip from sequence frame rate

Above clips will be whole clip by TP2 because of accurate frame matching.

edgecode & TOD(time of day)
If your proxy file's timecode track is edgecode, ReLinkTool v1.2 can not relink.
Because RedCine-X 221 always output TOD.
This case, you should use ReLinkTool v1.1.
ReLinkTool v1.1 doesn't check timecode, but merged mode only.

Thank you.
 
Ryota

Could 'clip handles' be remembered as a setting? (rather than resetting to 120 frames at every restart?

Please see this post for some issues I am having with the workflow, that seem to be RCX related.

Thanks

Trevor
 
Thank you for using TP2.
'Clip Handles' is remembered now, at least my environment.
Are you using version 1.2?
I will check it.

AC and EC issue...
If you are OK at 'Merged' mode, ReLinkTool need not check Timecode.
I can make no check version.
Of course, The best thing is RCX can export .mov with EC.

Sorry for my English.
Thanks.
 
R3Ds in Multiple Directories

R3Ds in Multiple Directories

Helo,

What is the procedure to tell the software where the folders are located, when you have the R3Ds in multiple drives or directories?

Thanks,
 
Ryota,

When I try to use the Re-Link procedure, I get reported 92 problems out of 103 clips!!!

When I created the LUA with TP2, it moved all fine to RCX. However, I always export with the RCX option of rendering on separate folders per clip. This will add the suffix of SXXX to any subsequent clips from the same shot.

Any problem with this procedure? See attached report:

View attachment 8236

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top