Mike 'Fireman' Ross
Well-known member
Folks,
I've been peeking at the world of RED on and off for a few years. When I first read about the R1 I had two thoughts:
1. It's not really relevant to me. But...
2. These guys are mounting a revolution and they're going to win.
So I went and told my wife (a senior banker on Wall St.) 'BUY!' (the firm, not the camera!) - only to discover that all the capital was privately held. Bugger.
Move on three years... I'm shooting more video, and you have DSMC. I'm sold. I'm buying. I'm fed up hauling multiple systems up volcanoes. I look at the results from my Nikon D3 and wonder 'why can't I shoot video that looks like that?'. I guess now I can.
Questions:
1. I trust RED, they are professionals selling to professionals. If they think they can make a camera viable for professional still work that doesn't have an optical viewfinder, I expect them to make it work. But can anyone who has used a RED system for stills comment on this aspect?
2. I shoot a variety of different subjects - landscapes, up close & personal volcanic eruptions, and industrial interiors to name but three. Around 50% of the time the standard lens on one of my D3s is the 14-24mm F2.8 zoom, and I use every mm of both ends. So FX sensor is a non-negotiable must; crop factors are unwelcome and need not apply. Also, I have a very significant investment in top-end Nikon glass, which I will have to use. So I guess Scarlet FF with Nikon mount is the camera for me? What's the latest on delivery & pricing for that? From what I've gathered wading through other threads, Scarlet is fairly imminent?
3. HDR. Unless the nature of the subject precludes it, every shot I take is bracketed fivefold, to keep the option of HDR processing open. I haven't seen it mentioned, but I presume Scarlet has/will have the usual bracketing options in 'still' mode, in addition to the (very clever, WANT to play!) HDRx motion picture system?
Thanks!
Mike
I've been peeking at the world of RED on and off for a few years. When I first read about the R1 I had two thoughts:
1. It's not really relevant to me. But...
2. These guys are mounting a revolution and they're going to win.
So I went and told my wife (a senior banker on Wall St.) 'BUY!' (the firm, not the camera!) - only to discover that all the capital was privately held. Bugger.
Move on three years... I'm shooting more video, and you have DSMC. I'm sold. I'm buying. I'm fed up hauling multiple systems up volcanoes. I look at the results from my Nikon D3 and wonder 'why can't I shoot video that looks like that?'. I guess now I can.
Questions:
1. I trust RED, they are professionals selling to professionals. If they think they can make a camera viable for professional still work that doesn't have an optical viewfinder, I expect them to make it work. But can anyone who has used a RED system for stills comment on this aspect?
2. I shoot a variety of different subjects - landscapes, up close & personal volcanic eruptions, and industrial interiors to name but three. Around 50% of the time the standard lens on one of my D3s is the 14-24mm F2.8 zoom, and I use every mm of both ends. So FX sensor is a non-negotiable must; crop factors are unwelcome and need not apply. Also, I have a very significant investment in top-end Nikon glass, which I will have to use. So I guess Scarlet FF with Nikon mount is the camera for me? What's the latest on delivery & pricing for that? From what I've gathered wading through other threads, Scarlet is fairly imminent?
3. HDR. Unless the nature of the subject precludes it, every shot I take is bracketed fivefold, to keep the option of HDR processing open. I haven't seen it mentioned, but I presume Scarlet has/will have the usual bracketing options in 'still' mode, in addition to the (very clever, WANT to play!) HDRx motion picture system?
Thanks!
Mike