THE INVENTION OF BEING, by IMF. RED CAMERA AND THE BIG BANG :-)

[ivan friedman]

,,,

 

[Jeremy Wiles]

Good work, Ivan. However, I'd say there's about as much chance as the universe creating itself than there was this video creating itself without a designer. It only goes to show there is an amazing creator behind it all

 

[ivan friedman]

...

 

[Jeremy Wiles]

Thank you Jeremy...hmm not sure I agree about the designer in both cases...) the work here is in front of the camera not much behind. the expression invention "in-venire" here wants to describe this process by wich things are not created.. but rather just comme to light)

thanks for watching and nice comment)

I'm not sure if I have enough faith to believe that things just magically "come to light" or invent themselves. The belief that there was nothing and nothing happened to nothing and then nothing magically exploded for no reason, creating everything and then a bunch of everything magically rearranged itself for no reason whatsoever into self-replicating bits which then turned into dinosaurs. Makes perfect sense.

 

[Zhibo Lai]

I'm not sure if I have enough faith to believe that things just magically "come to light" or invent themselves. The belief that there was nothing and nothing happened to nothing and then nothing magically exploded for no reason, creating everything and then a bunch of everything magically rearranged itself for no reason whatsoever into self-replicating bits which then turned into dinosaurs. Makes perfect sense.

Great visuals ivan, reminiscent of tree of life a bit.

Jeremy, not to take this too off topic, but there are many theories out there explaining how the universe came into being, and it's not from nothing, more so from 11 dimensional hyper space. Universes are being created destroyed all the time. There are many books you can read to brush up on the subject. Without having any background knowledge in these theories, it definitely sounds like ridiculous hogwash and a load of sci-fi crap. But the more and more I read about it, the more it starts to make sense and actually feasible. Of course, it's still all theoretical at this point.

The other question I'm sure others have asked you is, who created the Creator? Surely such a powerful and perfect being must also have been designed by something even greater.

 

[Jeremy Wiles]

Great visuals ivan, reminiscent of tree of life a bit.

Jeremy, not to take this too off topic, but there are many theories out there explaining how the universe came into being, and it's not from nothing, more so from 11 dimensional hyper space. Universes are being created destroyed all the time. There are many books you can read to brush up on the subject. Without having any background knowledge in these theories, it definitely sounds like ridiculous hogwash and a load of sci-fi crap. But the more and more I read about it, the more it starts to make sense and actually feasible. Of course, it's still all theoretical at this point.

The other question I'm sure others have asked you is, who created the Creator? Surely such a powerful and perfect being must also have been designed by something even greater.

Yes, I have been asked "who created the creator" question before. As a matter of fact, I've been asked many times because it's usually the first and major objection an atheist will put forward. You first need to understand the laws of thermodynamics, which says that everything is in decay. If you could sit and watch the roof on your house for the next 20 years, you'd have a fine grasp on the law of decay. Everything is winding down, breaking apart and coming to an end. The universe had a beginning; almost no one disputes that, because the laws of thermodynamics demand it: the universe is running down and it cannot have been running down forever, or it would have already run down. No stars would be still churning out energy and we would not be here.

You proposed one universe giving birth to another, but again, there cannot be an infinite series of such births and deaths, as each cycle must have less energy available than the last and if this had been happening for eternity, the death of everything would have already happened. In short, the cause of the universe must have been non-material because if the cause was material / natural, it would be subject to the same laws of decay as the universe. That means it would have to have had a beginning itself and you have the same problem as cycles of births and deaths of universes. So the cause of the universe’s beginning must have been super-natural, i.e. non-material or spirit—a cause outside of space-matter-time. Such a cause would not be subject to the law of decay and so would not have a beginning. That is, the cause had to be eternal spirit. Hopefully, that answers your question.


Where did the word "Universe" originate? "Uni" means “Single” and verse means “sentence”, or a single spoken sentence. And God said, “Let there be light.” God spoke the Universe into existence in a “single spoken sentence”.

 

[ivan friedman]

...

 

[Mathieu Ghekiere]

Reminded me of Tree of Life, which I really liked. Was a visually completely stunning movie, and felt more of an experience on the big screen. Second time I watched it in the theatre, I found the religious overtones towards the end a bit too explicit to my opinion, I liked it more when it was more (for a lack of a better word) spiritual without making the link with a Christian God (I'm atheist myself). The last 10 minutes of that movie were really bad, but what came before really hypnotized me.
Enough of the off-topic.

How did you get all the space imagery? What's the music piece?

Thanks,

 

[ivan friedman]

...