Scott Crawley
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2009
- Messages
- 3,947
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I don't doubt it is possible to design new components for R1 to accommodate Dragon, but I can understand why they would chose to put their efforts into the future of Red rather than it's past. If we carry all of our past baggage with us continually it will load us down and we become sluggish. Red needs to remain agile in order to stay on top, and that is in the best interest of all RedUsers. I hate to refer to the cornerstone of the company as "past baggage" because it implies a negative that doesn't really apply, but if Jim & Co. have to carry Red One around their necks for much longer it will certainly become a negative influence. Eyes forward people!
Sure it was an economic descision... not just economics of finance but also of manpower resources. The engineers and designers at Red undoubtedly have their hands full already and don't have time to dedicate to keeping R1 up to date.
Investments in legacy seldom pay off like futures do. ;-)
Sure it was an economic descision... not just economics of finance but also of manpower resources. The engineers and designers at Red undoubtedly have their hands full already and don't have time to dedicate to keeping R1 up to date.
Investments in legacy seldom pay off like futures do. ;-)
I do think that those of us to took Jim's comment about people selling their RED Ones would be sorry confused a whole lot of people. It certainly did me. I was certain that they'd allow us to upgrade again.
I'm quite certain that the new sensor will not be going into the RED One entirely for economic reasons rather than technical ones. I have more confidence in RED's technicians than that. And I know Jim does, as well.
As for prices, well, RED Ones these days look a lot like internet stocks in 2001. It's all downhill from here.
Stephen
Last edited: