Stumbled across this.

[Jarred Land]

Someone's been peeking through our windows...

 

[J. Eric Camp]

So it seems that RED has relinquished their manufacturing contract in favor of their own new "much more better" short zoom.

Lovely.

 

[Pawel Achtel]

Someone's been peeking through our windows...

...or just confirmed a dumb-arse shot in the dark. LOL

Nice one!

Sooo now, that there is hardly anything else to hide, let us know all the specs and delivery dates... :ihih: ...oh, and turn the damn key-light on :001_tt2:

 

[Ryan S]

One of your guesses is correct. I would probably put money on it not being the last two.

You sly dog, you.

I'm curious to see what you've come up with. I have to wonder though, how can a new Pro zoom be the same size (or so it appears) as the old 18-50, when the 18-85 is so large?

I'm know we'll hear all the details when the time is right. But curiosity has been contracted, and the incubation period is short.

 

[Jarred Land]

BTW.. this lens was used to shoot both Snappy, and Jim's iphone 4000 shot.

 

[Jeff Kilgroe]

OK, I'm officially confused. That lens for sale thru B&H is mighty fishy...

Anyway, love the shot of the new lens. Please let this be a new zoom. Something like a 15-40 T2.4. Please?

 

[Jeff Kilgroe]

BTW.. this lens was used to shoot both Snappy, and Jim's iphone 4000 shot.

Hmmm... I had assumed Snappy was shot with the new 18mm RPP. Oops, my bad.

And the ISO 4000 shot too? OK, Jim did say "RED Pro zoom at T2.8". I guess I just ASSumed the 18-85.
:biggrin:

 

[Roberto Lequeux]

Yea I thought it was the 18-85 as well. Looks snappy Jared!

Anything ready to be shared on pricing?

Or weight?

 

[Pawel Achtel]

BTW.. this lens was used to shoot both Snappy, and Jim's iphone 4000 shot.

hmmm....close focus. Nice.

 

[Ryan S]

Check out Recon, kids...

 

[C.H.Haskell]

BTW.. this lens was used to shoot both Snappy, and Jim's iphone 4000 shot.

Where can I find these? Looking for more images taken with 17-50 pro. Best