Russ McDonald
Well-known member
Since we are talking about very limited budgets, what about a really nice looking short (that is a cut down from a feature length script) vs. a poor looking feature? A nice looking, proof-of-concept short could be pedaled around to investors in hopes of raising money to shoot the feature on a bigger budget.
-A
In fairness to Shawn the short as a learning tool, or a calling card, he's right they are worth the time.
In your context Adkimery, to use it as a tool to move the project to the next level. I would highly recommend that you do so, keep it short, more like a trailer than a 10 min visual synopsis. That's what I did with Eddie's Night Out. I spent about 1300.00 to do the trailer, and it got me 50,000. A month later I was shoot my first feature.
I'm a jump in the deep end guy, I had over 15 years experience before I shot Eddies. Those first couple days, I was aware of what I was doing, but it felt like I was watching myself do it. It was intimidating, and believe me I'm not a guy who gets intimidated easily.