Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Steven Soderberh’s State Of Cinema Talk

Status
Not open for further replies.
“Action – Adventure”! When in a “Motion Picture Film”; What-is-it? Interesting question, especially the “Adventure” part of the equation! How many times have we heard the term in “everyday-use”, an “Adventure”, it usually starts with a JOURNEY that takes us away from everyday life, in time and space, past, present, and future. I can still remember the words of; “Joseph Campbell”, the start of “THE HEROES JOURNEY”! I really had to dig deep-down in my memories to “pull-his-name-out” out of the depth of my past, it came to me this morning while taking a “shower” of-course that’s one of the places where “all-good-ideas” come from, there must be something “when-hot-water-hits-the-naked-body” your eyes are close so you don’t get soap in your eyes that momentarily remove you from the reality of “every-day-life”, it elicits Ideas, Recollections, Inventions and New Revelations! Then is easy after that to look it up in Wekipidia.com; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Campbell how fortunate we are to have that reference for anything we’re interest in looking-up!

Joseph John Campbell (March 26, 1904 – October 30, 1987 – age 83) was a man that travelled throughout World, in search of the MEANING OF THE MYTH, his belief that “God” “was-in-all-of-our-souls” yours, mine, everyone’s, without reference to religion, he spoke English, French, German, Latin, and Japanese, he was a student of James Joyce. Gorge Lucas gives him credit with influencing his Star War’s Films repertoire and was often a guest at the Lucas “Sky Walker Ranch”; he was a genius in my humble opinion!

TO QUOTE FROM WIKIPIDIEA.COM; “Bruce Robison writes that "Campbell would refer to those days as a time when everything in his life was taking shape.... CAMPBELL, THE GREAT CHRONICLER OF THE 'HERO'S JOURNEY' IN MYTHOLOGY, recognized patterns that paralleled his own thinking in one of Ricketts's unpublished philosophical essays. Echoes of Carl Jung, Robinson Jeffers and James Joyce can be found in the work of Steinbeck and Ricketts as well as Campbell." Wikipidiea.com

In order to have “Action” there has to be an “Adventure”, or the other way around, it does not matter they are link together; you cannot have one without the other. It plays in movies (screenwriting) over and over again. TO QUOTE SOME MORE; “In 1940 Campbell attended a lecture by Professor Heinrich Zimmer at Columbia University; the two men became friends, and Campbell looked upon Zimmer as a mentor. Zimmer TAUGHT Campbell “that myth” (RATHER THAN A GURU OR SPIRITUAL GUIDE) could serve in the role of a personal mentor, IN THAT ITS STORIES PROVIDE A PSYCHOLOGICAL ROAD MAP FOR THE FINDING OF ONESELF IN THE LABYRINTH OF THE COMPLEX MODERN WORLD. Zimmer relied more on the meanings of mythological tales (THEIR SYMBOLS, METAPHORS, IMAGERY, ETC.) as a source for psychological realization than upon psychoanalysis itself. Campbell later borrowed from Jung's interpretative techniques and then reshaped them in a fashion that followed Zimmer's beliefs—INTERPRETING DIRECTLY FROM WORLD MYTHOLOGY. This is an important distinction, because it serves to explain why Campbell did not directly follow Jung's footsteps in applied psychology.” Wikipidiea.com

I would highly recommend reading the entire Wikipidiea.com article, and if you want to go further that much the better, it’s one of the basis for everything in the “Theatrical Motion Picture Creation”, the pitched, the written outline, the story line, the script, the storyboard, and the documentary film whatever “you-want-to-call-it”, “it-is” there, “all-of-it”! Don’t take my word for it, read it, then it will go into your subconscious, where many other things exist today, it’s you’re your life’s history (or story), you may want to recall it back one day, when you take a shower, or go on vacation, or walk alone on the beach, or whatever you do to take you out of your environment that makes you feel comfortable, when you go-on an “Adventure” to another place.

That makes me remember Lester Navarro’s, a professor we had at USC Cinema, he taught his class at his studio, he always said, “you-don’t-have-to-understand” what I’m saying RIGHT NOW, it will eventually come back to you when YOU REALLY NEED-IT, “and-so-it-did”, many times. It was good advice, it worked, is in the subconscious of your mind, along with all the other memories that you have accumulated along the “path-of-life”...

Joseph John Campbell, took the time to travel, lean languages, meet people from the past, read their books, share their personal experiences, and synthesized it into his own ideas which he then share with all of us through his written works, audio cassettes, and documentaries that have been created about him during a lifetime of 83 years, we should all thank him for it, I do, Thank You Joseph Campbell wherever you may you be “rest-in-peace”!

How many times have we begun a story with; I was sitting around an “Action” (insert words) that occurred to send me on an “Adventure” (insert words)! Such as “The Avengers”, “The Hobbit”, “Spiderman” (was bitten by a spider), “Star Wars” (sitting on a planet and you discover something).

I think you get the drift, “I-use” the word “MYTHOLOGY” to describe Joseph Campbell, how about “THE HEROES JOURNEYS”, they’re all part of the lexicon of screenwriting, and you can’t have an “Action”, without a “Reaction”. You can’t have a “Theatrical Motion Picture” without a “Screenplay”. You can’t have a screenplay without an “Idea”. The Script is the “creative-guiding-instrument” that is handed down to the “team-to-interpret”; The Producer, Director, the Director of Photography, the Actors, the Location Manager, the Production Designer, the Costumes Designer, Composer, Editor and on and on, it all began “with-that-idea”, the one on “The Script”! Each person looked at the script “on-their-own-way”, all under the direction of the Director, but they all “contributed-to-the-whole”, which then becomes a “Theatrical Motion Picture”!

Humberto Rivera
 
Your Joseph Campbell post re-kindled an old memory for me.

During the days when C Band satellite was unscrambled and I could get the PBS feed unfettered, I came upon Campbell's lectures "The Heroes Journeys". Each day I would make it a point to be sitting in front of the TV when that was shown and found his teachings in some cases affirmed... in other cases shaped, my beliefs. I was younger then and still seeking who I was. Now I don't give that much thought.

Maybe occasionally I stop and think how I'm different from who I remember being 5 or 10 years ago. Then I smile and just go on about my business. I think it is very important to benchmark, much like one would mark the height of a growing child on a door facing, ones interpretation of self. But then, don't spend too much time dwelling on it unless you find yourself lacking in some respect.

In that case, I think it's good to put in the work to become something more acceptable to your ego in relation to your id and super ego.

ADDITIONAL: In re: C Band satellite, I remember watching a Monday Night Football national feed and during commercial time which wasn't shown, I could still hear the audio of the announcers in the booth... at that time, Howard Cosell and Dandy Don Meredith and another guy, Frank Gifford, I think.

Anyway, Meredith told Cosell "I'll bet you (x amount of $) that so and so running back runs for a touchdown the next play." Cosell said he would take that bet and sure enough the next play was a running play by that running back. During the next commercial break Cosell said "Pay me. He didn't score a touchdown." Meredith said "I didn't say he would score a touchdown, but he WAS running for a touchdown, so you pay me."

I bring this up because that is the kind of thing that can kill you in the legalities of the movie business. And you can't even trust a lawyer to fully cover you. After all, Cosell was a lawyer before he became an obnoxiously effective announcer. '-)
 
Last edited:
I just wanted to take a minute to say, that my computer was broken about a week ago, so I haven't been able to post anything! Elsie Glad that you liked the post, and that it awaken some memories. Till my computer comes back from repair. I'm using my wife's machine, it's different than mine!

Humberto Rivera
 
ODEMAX, when is the first “Official Release” coming? I guess is still on “Beta Test”; however I see great potential “for-it” once it’s “Officially Release”, whenever it-is! It will be a new “Distribution Option” for any “Motion Picture” of any stripe. What will the “Price-Be” for a “Motion Picture Film”, will still be 30% - 70% split? How long would the “License Fee” be for an “Audience Member”? I guess those question will be answered in the Fall which it's now here (or Winter, or Spring) (not sure on the year) is the best guess! How will the image play; RedRay Player, Hi-End BlueRay, Netflix and other VOD, Play Station 4, X-Box, your computer or whatever the market will invent, but certainly RedRay! However there are a lot of unknowns at this point. Will it reach be the whole World, or were there “be-certain-limitations”? What is the “Censor-do”? There is the question of “Encryption and Decryption” on the other end, that’s a recent big deal! What will the actual Aspect Ration be, 2.40:1 or will accommodate 2:1, or will accommodate IMAX, how will ODEMAX distinguish one “Aspect Ration” from another? There are certainly a lot of unanswered questions! But one day they will be answered!

Humberto Rivera
 
“In 1940 Campbell attended a lecture by Professor Heinrich Zimmer at Columbia University; the two men became friends, and Campbell looked upon Zimmer as a mentor. Zimmer TAUGHT Campbell “that myth” (RATHER THAN A GURU OR SPIRITUAL GUIDE) could serve in the role of a personal mentor, IN THAT ITS STORIES PROVIDE A PSYCHOLOGICAL ROAD MAP FOR THE FINDING OF ONESELF IN THE LABYRINTH OF THE COMPLEX MODERN WORLD. Zimmer relied more on the meanings of mythological tales (THEIR SYMBOLS, METAPHORS, IMAGERY, ETC.) as a source for psychological realization than upon psychoanalysis itself. Campbell later borrowed from Jung's interpretative techniques and then reshaped them in a fashion that followed Zimmer's beliefs—INTERPRETING DIRECTLY FROM WORLD MYTHOLOGY. This is an important distinction, because it serves to explain why Campbell did not directly follow Jung's footsteps in applied psychology.” Wikipidiea.com

excellent overview of campbellian theory - thanks for sharing (:
 
Thanks Paul, you’re certainly welcomed!

Finally, someone has designed a Cine Lens for the “Epic 6K Dragon Camera”; it’s the Leica Summicron-C lenses T2; Read about it here http://www.fdtimes.com/2013/12/06/leica-summicron-c-lenses-arrive/

One line in the article said; “The image circle is greater than 34 mm, making them a good match for the RED Epic Dragon sensor in 6K mode.”

Humberto Rivera
 
Here is an article in The Hollywood Reporter that I found of particular interest; http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/nikki-finke-hires-charlie-sheen-665623 Nikki Finke Hires Charlie Sheen Lawyer as Penske Arbitration Nears 5:25 PM PST 12/13/2013 by Eriq Gardner.

Nikki Finke you might remember was a Hollywood News Reporter that I found interesting to quote from time to time; she always seemed to have the inside “scooped” on many different stories. I think this case might make the Hollywood NDA (Non Disclosure Agreement) and the non-compete agreement come into questioning.

TO QUOTE FROM THE ARTICLE; “"It's our position that the non-compete to which Penske refers is invalid, is unenforceable, and it violates California law," Briggs tells The Hollywood Reporter "There is simply no case law nor-statutory law that supports Penske's position. Any notion or theory that there might be a joint partnership between Penske and Nikki is complete fiction. There was a written employment agreement between the two." Briggs adds that if Finke's tweets come up, he'll offer the opinion that "Nikki has substantial First Amendment rights -- rights which cannot be undermined by Penske's attempt to silence her." The Hollywood Reporter

I have always been of the opinion that the Constitution of “The United States of America” Trumps any State Law, within reason of course. We’ll see how it all comes out at the end. At the time the Constitution was written there was only one means of communication, the Written Letter, which traveled by horse to its destination! And the Printed Press! Now there are many forms to communicate! Including The Motion Picture!

Humberto Rivera
 
I’ve been thinking using a S3D Rig is burdensome; it’s heavy, besides you lose a full T-Stop in the process, and for the most part the lenses are T 2.0 in some of the fast lenses with the exception of the Zeiss Master Prime and Summicron-C prime lenses. And of course the added expense of an S3D Expert (one or more) on the premises. But I was thinking if you use an anamorphic lens like the one that “Service Vision” makes, it Covers up to an ANSI super 35 Silent Frame (31.14 mm diameter) using two “Epic Dragon Cameras”, on a side by side mode. You might actually be able to use the “Two Cameras” as one continuum across a wide perspective (each at 2:4.1 “Aspect Ratios”). That would allow you to Split the image across the S3D overlap coverage.

http://www.servicevision.es/sites/d...ens-anamorphic-2x/anamorphiclensesabril13.pdf, their good pdf, or http://www.servicevision.es/en/product-selling/scorpiolens-anamorphic-2x and the Article appearing on “Service Vision” web site.

“THE ARTICLE SAYS IN PART; “Thanks to a new anamorphic design, the new Patent-Pending lenses keep the advantages from spherical ones with the great anamorphic look. Small size and weight: You can handle them like spherical, and use standard matt boxes and filters. Virtually no distortion or breathing: No need for tricks while shooting: any need to avoid columns or corners, or move the camera while focusing. High aperture with quality: No need to stop down the lens or extra illumination. No change of compression for close positions: Close focus similar to spherical lenses, without the "FAT FACES" effect. Price similar to spherical lenses.”

“Same frontal diameter over the entire. Compatible with film and digital cameras. Feet and meter focus scales that can be exchanged. Internal focus to keep the external position of the lens constant. PL Mount. Telecentric design. Floating elements for a good close-up performance. Multiaspheric design High optical performance: High resolution and contrast. Uniform quality over the whole field of view. Minimized breathing and distortion. Consistent optical performance across the whole focus range.” SV

Just saying! I think it’s possible, they key is the 31.14 “Image Circle” of the “Service Vision” lenses, and you would need a solid base to put the two Cameras on! And what if you used a “Carbon Fiber” camera on a “Carbon Fiber base”, and two "RED 3-axis Lens Controls" System in sync with each other? http://www.red.com/store/products/red-3-axis-lens-control-system

Humberto Rivera
 
The Chinese are coming, the Chinese are coming! According to an article in The Hollywood Reporter That’s the case; http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/eccentric-chinese-millionaire-says-hes-668190 “Eccentric Chinese Millionaire Says He's Prepping Bid for 'New York Times' (Report)” The Hollywood Reporter

Quote; “Chen Guangbiao, a wealthy Chinese businessman who made his fortune in waste management, claims he is mulling a bid to take a controlling stake in the NEW YORK TIMES.”

Another quote; “Arthur Sulzberger Jr., chairman and publisher of THE NEW YORK TIMES, said in 2013 that his family, which controls the paper, has no interest in selling it.”

But somewhere in their there are the intentions of eventually taking over some major American newspaper that has worldwide influence. The Chinese are coming, we just don’t kwon when! Let an American Company think of trying to do THAT!

Humberto Rivera
 
The Chinese are coming, the Chinese are coming! According to an article in The Hollywood Reporter That’s the case; http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/eccentric-chinese-millionaire-says-hes-668190 “Eccentric Chinese Millionaire Says He's Prepping Bid for 'New York Times' (Report)” The Hollywood Reporter

Quote; “Chen Guangbiao, a wealthy Chinese businessman who made his fortune in waste management, claims he is mulling a bid to take a controlling stake in the NEW YORK TIMES.”

Another quote; “Arthur Sulzberger Jr., chairman and publisher of THE NEW YORK TIMES, said in 2013 that his family, which controls the paper, has no interest in selling it.”

But somewhere in their there are the intentions of eventually taking over some major American newspaper that has worldwide influence. The Chinese are coming, we just don’t kwon when! Let an American Company think of trying to do THAT!

Humberto Rivera
This reminds me of the times when the Japanese seemed to be "buying America!" They bought movie studios, our most famous golf course, businesses... you name it, they were buying it. At the time I was concerned. Over time, things like this leave me unconcerned.

We have made ourselves into what the insurance industry labels as an "attractive nuisance." That is, we attract these foreign investors because we are an attractive investment. Money flows into the U.S. economy because we are open to money coming in. The world will become more civilized through trade and business associations than it will by war and nation building, so I see this as a good thing.

Humberto, I understand your concerns and in regard to our media we should be wary. But I think there is so much alternative media to counter-balance any attempted slanting of the news toward a China centric reporting by any one newspaper that such a style would be made public and the newspaper would lose the public trust and therefore, readership... something no newspaper can survive in today's market.

Besides, newspapers already slant the news rather than just reporting it, even by choosing which news to report.
 
Elsie, like always you’re absolutely right! I remember when the Japanese bought the Rockefeller Center in New York, which was disaster for them, Columbia Pictures is a different thing, they did adapt. Funny, no one has ever complaint about the British owning a huge part of America since the 1775s, but that’s another conversation. The Japanese went down the tube, and the British been around since the beginning of the Revolutionary War.

The problem with the Chinese is that almost everything is either owned by the Chinese Communist Government, or control by it, and they have strong Laws against foreigners opening a business in China, like a Film Distribution Company, or Film Production Company, not without the active participation of the Government, like in the case of “The China Film Group”. Funny, we don’t use the word “Communist” when we referred to China too often, not anymore (they’ve become an important trading partners); they still have the same flag, the same country, and control their Chinese population. For example, those toys that come from China; http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/02/world/asia/for-prostitutes-in-china-jail-with-no-recourse.html?hp “For Prostitutes Jailed in China, Forced Labor With No Recourse”

To quote from the article in the New York Times; “The government does not publish regular statistics on the program, but experts estimate that 18,000 to 28,000 women are sent to detention centers each year. Inmates are required to pay for food, medical exams, bedding and other essential items like soap and sanitary napkins, with most women spending about $400 for a six-month stay, the report said.” The New York Times

That’s the same New York Times that Mr. Chen Guangbiao, the wealthy Chinese businessman that wants control over the Newspaper; meanwhile the New York Times reporters are waiting for their VISAs to enter China. Go figure! Maybe they will really revolutionize in the future and change their ways.

Humberto Rivera
 
Just to add a few more thoughts to the Chinese comments above. Ever since Oscar Arias, the President of Costa Rica changed from Taiwan to the People Republic of China, and China did give for free the country’s new “National Stadium” that everyone is really proud off. That has been followed by a series of scandals; where they want to build new roads, a refinery in Limon, Costa Rica, and so on and on, for a “Price” with a questionable Chinese Construction Company.

I really don’t know how “easy-or-difficult” it is to build a bridge across the Pacific Ocean, time will tell! For now do they think of Costa Rica as a Banana Republic, or as a Democratic Country were everyone has a voice, and belief me when I say the Voices in Costa Rica are everywhere and they are Different and highly Diverse, and there is a Constitutional Court where any Citizen can Lodge a Complaint. Law Suits take years and years to resolve, someone might actually die before one is resolved!

In 2013 we had two well known 747s land at Juan Santa Maria International Airport in San Jose, Costa Rica! First we had Air Force One carrying The President of the United States of America, Barak Obama, followed by a second 747 caring Chinas President Xi Jinpin of the Peoples Republic of China and his wife, among others.

I should really stop my-complaints about China, it’s their Country, it’s their way of life, so good luck to them, and maybe we’ll see changes in 2015 as it rolls around next year. Happy Filmmaking in 2014 and beyond!

Humberto Rivera
 
I was reading an interesting article in The Hollywood Reporter; http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/two-thirds-us-adults-say-669933 “Two-Thirds of U.S. Adults Say They Go to the Movies Less Often (Study)” 3:38 PM PST 1/10/2014 by Hilary Lewis and it was based on a study done by Harris Company; http://www.harrisinteractive.com/Ne... Default/mid/1508/ArticleId/1361/Default.aspx “The Silver Screen Slump: Americans Say They're Going to the Movies Less Often” or the pdf; http://www.harrisinteractive.com/vault/Harris Poll 2 - Movies_1.10.2014.pdf

I think, and this is JUST MY OPINION, but we’re heading for a larger and large Audience Group at HOME of all ages watching a Motion Picture Film on any one of Multiple Devises (here now, or jet to be invented), rather than BIG SCREEN. For example as the Sound at home is continually improving, the TV sets are getting larger and larger, and as 4K at home becomes a reality, we have THE PERFECT STORM.

Hypothetically speaking, let’s say in the year 2020 (six years, depending on how you count), which it’s not really that far from now, you have a choice to make, do we got in the TV/Cinema Room (or to a neighbors for a familiar gathering), or do we go out to the Movie Theater, it will be rather difficult to make that choice. You’re paying one charge at home, the other everyone in your party is not only paying for their ticket (or you), but also for the inflated “Candy Counter” (especially if you have kids with you), and you might also need to pay for parking, and WHAT IF THE STREETS ARE ALL SNOWED IN. Just saying!

I would recommend reading both the The Hollywood Reporter article and the accompanying Study by Harris!

Humberto Rivera
 
Jacqueline Bisset slipped by the NBC censors on Sunday night at the Golden Globes, I think it was no accident, the “over-the-air” Networks are re-thinking their position on un-scheduled obscenity, most of the Golden Globes Prizes were won by Cable and Pay Per View Players, they’ve become more and more IMPORTANT, the “what-use-to-be” the three Major Networks are slowly being left behind, by all the other competitors that mostly get their Television, Movies, and Sports through that cable, dished, and internet that comes into the American Household, there got to be at least 500 Channels on a World Wide basis! By the way Jacqueline Bisset had to walk for ever to get to the Podium, and then sound her best after the long, long walk, that’s a lot to ask of a 69 year young woman! Which brings me to the subject of 2020, what will it be like?

Thinking about it some more, about 2020, I think I like the hypothetical and hilly speculative idea of projecting out to the year 2020! It’s important that we do that because films that are NOW an idea that will eventually turn into a “Scripts”, sometimes it take five to six years before they entered the “Money Making Process of Film Distribution” (or-no Money Making), NOW REMEMBER THIS IS JUST MY OPINIONATEDLY SPECULATION, nothing more.

I’m going to skip the “Film Making Process” and just say it will be better than “Dragon”, no Idea what it will be, so I’ll just say it will much better, we’ve already “broke-ground” on that side of the road with the “Dragon” by replacing film as a capture medium and distribution is moving forward at a rapid pace, by the start of 2015 all the “Dragons” should be “out-the-door”.

Distribution is another thing; we’re moving toward the PERFECT STORM (metaphorically speaking) at a rapid pace; the sound quality at home will exceed anything we find in the “Best Theaters Today”. The Screen size should reach at least a “Gigantic 220 Inches” and it will be 4K. The home Player should be in a second or third generation such as the; “Red Player” by 2020. Take all these pieces and assemble them in one relative small room, with comfortable chairs’, and what do you have? A “Home Theater” for a relative large crowd, depending on the room size, it would be the EQUIVALENT of the “Billiards Room” of the past Centuries, make-it to the size that MEETS YOUR FINANCES!

But it does not end there, today “we-see-people” watching a Feature Length Motion Picture “on-an” iPad or iPhone? Play Station Eleven might be out by 2020, the same with X-Box, there might be more movies that are release as a “Motion Picture”, and “Video Game” at the same time, more realism. New devices, yet to be invented, I really could not tell you, but I can say as sure as the “Sun-will-Rise” tomorrow that there will be many. This would be a good spot FOR YOU TO FILL IN THE BLANKS, so please do write-up your version of the future!

We’re are at a crossroads where companies are beginning to show a “Wrist Watch” “kind-of-device” that have, a small screen that tells MORE THAN THE TIME, they’ve have a camera mounted on the sides, a microphone where the buckle goes, and God only knows what they will attached to their Invention. For example; a projection devices that can enlarge the screen to something that you can really see optically projected into space, the screen can be manipulated by the fingers in the same hand that holds the device. The hand movement has a certain imaginary “Motion Range Cube” of about two and one have size in feet or one meter, that can actualize a perfectly steady movement within that range.

These are things that are continually expanding at an exponential “time-span” as we move “through-space”, technology does not stand still, new companies will emerge, the World does not stand still, it’s a GLOBAL thing! The Chinese are closely behind us, the Europeans are trying to work together, and they might actually accomplish it by 2020. Someone might find a way of putting 1000 Giga Bytes through existing Internet Infrastructure; then what? Netflix will definitely have many competitors, ODEMAX, what if it all goes Wi-Fi, thought-out the “Planet Earth”, think about it! VOD (Video on Demand) might be called COD (Cinema on Demand). Something like GPS but COD, with multiple satellites circling across the Globe, those are a few of my Ideas of the top of my head.

Under the “Current Model” the distributor “works-up” the Audience to an “Anticipation Date”, through Publicity, Festivals, Television Appearance, World Wide Press, Adverting and whatever they can think-up, all for a specific “Time Slot” at specific place, “The Theater”. Then the watch and sweating starts the Thursday, Friday, and Saturday watched to see how the Film is going to-do including Sunday! Then you have a Big-Hit, a Medium-Hit, or a Flop! Some films are given a gentler introduction to the public. Whatever the number will then influence the press to get excited, and get in-line with the Distributer. The number also will determine how long the “Film Remains Theatrically”, this scenario is repeated throughout the World. BUT WAIT, the film has a “ten-year-life” and the numbers you’re talking about are “Box Office Gross”, not what is “Net Gross” to the Distributor for the first month or two, that’s a mystery. What about all those promotional cost, and trips, and on and on, there are mysteries too? What will 2020 be-like?

What if it didn’t HAVE TO BE THAT WAY, what if you could chose to watch what you wanted, when you wanted, in whatever City you were in the World? In whatever kind of devised you wanted, the large Television, the iPad on the front porch, the iPhone while you commute to work in the train? You didn’t have to be at such and such a place to make the “Big Numbers” work for the “Studio Executive”, to insure a value for their product in the subsequent ten year period. What if? What “if-YOU-did-not-have-to-be-the-answer” to all that money and effort so you could make the numbers work for the Studio? What if you could wear a headphone with glasses that transported you to the “Theater”? What if? You could live through a “Virtual Experience”, like “Opening Night” but on your “Time & Space”! Just saying!

Joseph Stalin once said; “If I can control Hollywood, I can Control the World!” That’s the mark the Chinese have set for themselves, but let’s not forget that India, with a similar large population, makes over 400 Motion Pictures Films a year, and what do they control, it’s a matter of different languages within the borders of each country. The international Markets are divided into roughly the following categories the Five English speaking countries; the USA, Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zeeland; Latin America including Mexico, Central America, South America, the Caribbean and Spain. Europe is a whole different animal with Germany, Italy, France, and Scandinavia, all with different languages, then there is Japan and surrounding countries, and of course China and Russia. For me the Middle East is something I don’t understand.

It’s just more than the “Audience”, it’s the way you make a film, they way you invent stories, the way you sell them World Wide, the competition, THE NON-GOVERNMENT CONTROL of the industry itself, it’s more than just buying “your-way-in”. Hollywood is a “state-of-mind” their films are shot thought-out the entire World, and are about things all over the World, but yet there is a “Hollywood Motion Picture Film”, were would you find another New York, London, Istanbul, the list goes on and on, but many recent Hollywood Films have been shot in the World and completed in Los Angeles and other cities! So how do you control a “state-of-mind” that’s a very difficult thing to-do. Who would you pitch an Idea to in “China”, what would the “Deal Memo” look like, do they have a good “Legal System” over there, I kind of doubt it. It takes more than money, don’t get me wrong, you do need money, but you also need ACCESS!

In the year 2020 there might be 120,000 to 160,000 Cinema Theaters World Wide “all-digital”, you would have to go-to a museum to see a film camera, but compare that to the Two Billion 4K Television Sets/Monitors estimated (by me) in the World of 2020, all connected somehow through a cable or a Wi-Fi transmission, or satellite transmission, or whatever they might invent in the future. It might be easier for George Lucas to get his 3,000 plus theaters to show his movie “Red Tails”, because the Theater just like the Television Networks would become irrelevant. For example the “Movie Audience Demographics” might change; the Hispanic Market in the United States might actually be the “Majority Population”, 2020 is not that far into the Future!

Just like it was back in the mid 1500s the Western part of the United States was Spanish speaking all the way down to “Tierra Del Fuego” at the tip of South America, the East Coast was British, and small French Colony along the water of the south, the oldest city in the currently in United States is San Agustín, Florida founded in 1565, it was the first European settlement by Spanish admiral Pedro Menéndez de Avilés, and subsequently served as the capital of Spanish Florida for TWO HUNDRED YEARS. THERE WERE NO AMERICANS THEN, mostly subjects of the Spanish and British Crowns, the Island of Puerto Rico was Spanish till the late 1890s, America had fought a long and costly Civil War, and things were different then. To this day Puerto Ricans living on the Island use Spanish as their first language and English as their second language a large number of Puerto Ricans are Bi-lingual. The World continues to evolve!

Well we got to wait till 2020 to find out how things turned “up-to-that” point for the Film Industry!

Humberto Rivera
 
What is the MOST VALUABLE “Entertainment Product”? Could-it-be a “Motion Picture Film” with all its ancillary products, such a simultaneous realistic “Video Game” using the same actors as in the Movie, Men & Women Fashions, “on-going” promotions such as Burger King and MacDonald’s, VOD (Video on Demand), DVDs, Cable Television Sales and on and on, “they-ALL- DO-generate-revenues”; DON’T THEY? Interesting question the “Motion Picture” has a “TEN YEAR EXPLOITATION-LIFE”, regardless of all the “Hollywood Hype”, a Movie has a life beyond it’s opening month or two, the “Box Office” number does not reflect the “Actual Money” that comes in the coffers for that effort (it’s much less), and then because they are the first (after the theater owner) to get their hands on the “Cash” they create all sorts of obstacles (and expenses) for all the people all the way down the line, with the possible exception of Wall Street, and even they get into “Law Suits” with them too. It’s in the accounting method used; “Hollywood Accounting”!

So why all the “Hype” about the “Box Office Receipts”; when in reality they don’t reflect ANYTHING significant for the entire length of the “Revenues Stream” for the entire “Motion Picture”? VALUE, that’s the answer, THOSE FEW FIRST MONTHS, will determine the “Value of the Picture”, all that Marketing effort will be concentrated on those “Opening Nights” (there is more than one across the World) their results will be posted everywhere (if they’re good), THE NUMBERS ARE NOT ACCURATE! Not for a Product with a “Ten Year Exploitation” life, but that’s the system that’s now in place and it seems everyone is playing along. There is a difference between “Gross Revenues” and “Net Revenues”, they only publish the “Gross Revenue” and tell the other people “who need-to-know” that the “Picture” DID NOT MAKE ANY MONEY, even years down the road, funny how that works!

So where does the “Cinema Distribution Model” on a shrinking “Global Market” FOR THE STUDIO, come to play for the “Year 2020”, there might actually be a change for the better, more “Theater Being Build”, more methods of “Electronic Delivery”, more “Inventions” to come, the landscape might actually might look different in 2020; MORE CHOICE, just like the “American Television Networks”, they are slowly fading into the past! I think the a system equal to GPS called COD (Cinema on Demand) is something to considered, a large number of satellites circling the World to deliver “what-you-want-when-you-wanted” might be a pretty good system! We’re talking about a “Multi-Billion Dollar Business” on World Wide basis! Someone might actually “try-it” who will it be?

I invited you to chime in-with your view of the “Year 2020”, who knows there might be some interesting ideas.

Humberto Rivera
 
Here is an opinion (my) and what the in the press (The Hollywood Reporter) says about getting a nomination for an “Oscar”; http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/robert-redfords-oscar-snub-whos-671762 “Robert Redford's Oscar Snub: Who's to Blame?” 9:39 AM PST 1/17/2014 by Gregg Kilday

THE ARTICLE SAYS IN PART; “The star pointed a finger at distributors Roadside and Lionsgate for failing to support the film, but others say Redford's at fault for refusing to campaign enough -- says one observer, he "made some appearances but he didn’t really work it." To hear Robert Redford tell it, a penny-pinching Roadside Attractions may have cost him an Oscar nomination for his performance as a man-of-few words, struggling to stay alive on the open sea in J.C. Chandor’s “ALL IS LOST” – at least that’s what the actor suggested as he faced the press at the opening of the Sundance Film Festival on Thursday. Others, though, are countering that Redford simply didn’t campaign hard enough to ensure himself a nom.” The Hollywood Reporter

This situation brings up an interesting point, can you actually get an “Oscar” awarded from your peers, and broadcast throughout the entire “Planet Earth”, without working the “crowed”, is that possible? And by the crowd I mean the “whole-shebang” for week or months on-end! Harvey Weinstein know this, too bad the “Movie” wasn’t with the “Weinstein Company”! Too bad he didn’t work harder with all of his “Hollywood Buddies”!

HERE IS WHAT REDFORD HAD TO SAY; “At his traditional appearance at Sundance’s opening press conference, Redford said he was “not upset” by the lack of a nomination. But by way of explanation, he laid much of the blame at the foot of the movie’s distributor. “Hollywood is what it is, it’s a business and so when these films go to be voted on, usually they’re heavily dependent on campaigns,” he said. “In our case I think we suffered from little to no distribution. And so as a result, our distributors – I don’t know why -- they didn’t want to spend the money, they were afraid, they were just incapable, I don’t know.” Robert Redford

So at the end is about “Value”, the “Value” that you accrued in those first few months, and they will last at least for the next “Ten Years”, OR during “The Academy Awards” on a “World Wide” basis! It’s all about “Marketing”!

Humberto Rivera
 
What does it mean; that not a single Red Camera was used in any of the films nominated for the “Academy Award” in 2014 it was not shot on the RED CAMERA that screened during 2013 and WAS PROBABLY BEGAN IN 2012? The “Red Epic Dragon” IS NOT YET FINISHED, Red moves at a very rapid pace. The Academy Awards move at a very slow pace, you have to go back to 2012 or 2011 to mark the beginning of the planning, and choices for what is now in COMPETITION for 2014.

We’re technically at a place that Arri IS NOT TODAY, we’ll see films that began shooting with the Epic MX for the 2015 “Academy Award” and in 2016 with the “Red Dragon”, so we must all wait our turn! But the tidal wave is coming, that you can be sure off!

You have a 100 Year Old Company competing with a relatively New Company the “Red Digital Company”. The Old Company has a great set of lenses in its “Zeiss/Arri Master Primes”, for my money the best in every regards, including that they fit within the slightly reduce image of “6000 X 3000” range of “The Red Dragon” at 33.5 Ø mm. But Red Dragon camera that we talked about recently, is not OFFICIALLY OUT YET, the “Arri Master Primes” were only used in “Prisoners” photograph by Roger Deakins ASC (which he always uses), and in SOME SHOTS of shots of “The Wolf of Wall Street” were shot with the Master Primes and “Gravity” (some lenses), That’s all! So go figure!

I will go out on a limp and say that a “Director” will come around and say to Roger Deakins ASC, try this camera (Red Dragon) for our next film, experiment with it and look AT ONLY THE FACTS as they exist at that time. It’s my opinion that he will choose the “Red Dragon”, the lenses will of course be the “Ziess/Arri Master Primes”, and off to the shoot they will go, just saying! After all; Red Dragon does have 16-17 stops of “Dynamic Rage”, and after Graeme Nattress completes his magic, God only knows what comes out the other end, but it will be GOOD.

Remember many Films have been shot with the Red Camera of all stripes http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?87365-Some-Thoughts/page2, THIS had been shot till 08-28-2013 for the full list consult http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_shot_in_digital ; many films have followed but they just haven’t been nominated THIS year! It takes me back what I said in the previous thread about films you have to-do-it; MARKETING to the “Academy Members”!

According to the list of films in production, I can only fiend two that are currently being shot with the “Epic Dragon Camera”; “Gone Girl” photograph by Jeff Cronenweth on the Red Epic Dragon, Peter Fincher Directing; and “Transformers: Age of Extinction”, photographed by Amir Mokri on IMAX Cargo Bay 3-D Camera, Red Epic Dragon, Michael Bay Directing! By the way Cronenweth and Fincher shot “The Social Network” (on a Red One) and “Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” (on a Red M-X), now “Gone Girl” on a Red Dragon Camera”!

I might also remind you that IMAX is much easier to convert too with the “Red Epic Dragon”; http://www.reduser.net/forum/showth...1-DCI-Container-with-1-9-1-Extension-for-IMAX , I think that if I omit all of the “Marketing Hype”, the “Red Epic Dragon” will come out on top!

Humberto Rivera
 
Paramount will stop delivering prints throughout the World in 35mm Movie Film; http://www.firstshowing.net/2014/pa...ibuting-film-prints-digital-only-from-now-on/ “Paramount to Stop Distributing Film Prints, Digital Only From Now On” by Alex Billington January 19, 2014 Source: LA Times

THE ARTICLE SAID IN PART; “THE END OF AN ERA. Maybe it's time to fire up Bob Dylan's song again. The LA Times reports that PARAMOUNT PICTURES has been informing movie theaters that Anchorman 2 is the last film they'll be distributing on film. From now on, THE STUDIO WILL ONLY DISTRIBUTE THEIR FILMS DIGITALLY, and Martin Scorsese's “The Wolf of Wall Street” was their first movie in wide release to be distributed entirely as DCP (DIGITAL CINEMA PRINTS). "For 120 years, film and 35 mm has been the format of choice for theatrical presentations. Now we're seeing the end of that," Jan-Christopher Horak, director of the UCLA Film & Television Archive, told the LA Times.”

So the previous few threads seem to apply, you might want to revisit them! 2020 is around the corner!

Humberto Rivera
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top