Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Sony Unveils 3-D Projector

Kwan Khan

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
3,804
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Location
NYC
Website
www.finalfootage.com
Wipe3out in 3D. Mmm.
 
It requires sync'd shutter glasses. Meh.... Absolutely no reason they can't produce this same projector with an alternately polarizing filter to allow for use with conventional polarized glasses. Oh, wait... But then they couldn't charge us $150 for heavy, shitty, shutter glasses. Yep.
 
It requires sync'd shutter glasses. Meh.... Absolutely no reason they can't produce this same projector with an alternately polarizing filter to allow for use with conventional polarized glasses. Oh, wait... But then they couldn't charge us $150 for heavy, shitty, shutter glasses. Yep.

Except that wouldn't work for people without a silver screen, and then you'd be complaining about the cost of the silver screen...

Of course, I'm sure we would both prefer it if Sony had silver screen manufacturing tech investments over consumer digital device tech investments in this instance because then they'd be selling the silver screens which make WAY more sense to the consumer then 3D shutter glasses, but what the hey.
 
Except that wouldn't work for people without a silver screen, and then you'd be complaining about the cost of the silver screen...

Special screen required, yes, to maintain polarization. Does it have to be silver? No. There are other materials that can do the same, I don't know how they relate in cost to silver right now. On the other hand, a single projector that can alternate polarization within itself would already provide quite a bit of savings over current dual-projector systems that place polarizing filters in front of the lenses.

I would think the cost of the screen would easily justify itself in contrast to buying several sets of shutter glasses at $130~$150 each. Especially if you're trying to set up a screening room or similar where you may have 8 to 15 people or more.

Of course, I'm sure we would both prefer it if Sony had silver screen manufacturing tech investments over consumer digital device tech investments in this instance because then they'd be selling the silver screens which make WAY more sense to the consumer then 3D shutter glasses, but what the hey.

Yep. :coolgleamA:
 
Back
Top