Erich Roland
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,905
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 69
- Location
- Fairfax Virginia
- Website
- www.dc-camera.com
The 5D has one trait the others don't - full frame almost the size of a vista vision neg. But after that it's all downhill. Since the MX has become standard, there has been a precipitous drop in 5D client work on my end. Thank God. I'll go back doing what it does best - taking stills.
What I find amazing with Sony, they have the technology to introduce something inexpensive and truly pro (PL mount, small form, built in doo dads we like, 4:2:2 intra frame recording) but they don't, probably thinking it'll cannibalize their high end gear. But now with HDRx™™™™™™™™™™™ in sight, they will have to go back to the drawing board and ask themselves the big questions: Low price / high volume / high quality vs High price / low volume / high quality.
For Red's sakes, Sony's still waffling with low price, low quality/ high volume model and their High Price/ Low Volume/ High Quality model is about to experience a broadside from HDRx™™™™™™™™™™ relegating it to the commercially unviable model: High Price/ Lower Volume/ 2nd place Quality.
You've expressed the reality from a manufacturers point of view. "low price, lower quality, high volume". This is the way these guys think, and for each segment of the product line its about figuring what features to add "just enough" to get the sales volume up, and not too many features, to rob sales from the next camera up the product chain. Its about marketing, and where the camera will fit into the product line and win sales relative to the competition.
It does feel like the F3 is a high price point for just a larger sensor, when we will soon have a similar spec in a much cheaper Af-100. But if you look around and see just how many Ex-1's and Ex-3's are out there and working steadily you can find the potential marketing logic. The Ex-3 kit is about 9k, and if street price for a F3 is really 13k, it does follow a path to the price point. I'm sure Sony is banking on the fact that they have 1000's of potential customers who use and love those EX cameras and may be ready to add a "35mm look" to their work having made a bunch of money back from the EX camera's.
Someone said it here a while back, "my Ex-3 paid for my Red one". These Ex cameras are great little cameras for for making (relatively) high quality HD images and with an easy work flow (regardless of technical flaws to XD codec). The Ex cams are a no-brainer camera to own, and own a few because were not all making "cinema" or art films, were just shooting what the client requires which is a low bar relative to Red. The F3 should do well because of all the current EX owners and the pressures to have available that "35mm look" and this is the easiest step to stay within the work flow they're used to. Plus lots of people trust Sony from using the products for decades.
Scarlett can (and should) change everyone's thinking in this "market segment" when it arrives, but until then people gotta work, and some people even need to spend money for year-end for taxes purposes, etc.