Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Shut up and shoot that RED (NSFW)

Gunleik Groven said:
412918_10151597525200126_23385574_o.jpg
Click to expand...

Thanks for posting these framegrabs!!!
What lens was this particular frame shot with? ;)
 
BTW... I don't mind overexposing or burning out stuff... as little as I mind underexposing and creating noise...
Or hitting the technically "good" exposure, if tat is right.

Just depends on what it should look like.


Really one of he things I love about the Epic, is how it performs when over- or under-exposed...
 
472865_10151608849320126_1831062573_o.jpg


One of the 1st images ever credited to me.

Ca 1977... Old Agfa Cam with issues with registration...

Sure

35mm is da shit...

;)
 
I viewed every page of this thread (took a while, maaany noteworthy shots), prior to this latest round it was the non-nudes that caught my eye the most (321, 333, and 492)... but 512 is lovely.
 
David Kuhn said:
I viewed every page of this thread (took a while, maaany noteworthy shots), prior to this latest round it was the non-nudes that caught my eye the most (321, 333, and 492)... but 512 is lovely.
Click to expand...

Thanks!

Nick Morrison said:
This is SO SHARP! Is this one of your Standard Primes?
Click to expand...





Actually all (except #513) of these of Raph on this page are shot with the same lens/lights/exposure, just developed a bit different.

If memory serves me, they are all the 85 Jena, stopped down... a lot. The lights are a single 2500 tungsten "redhead" kinda thingy just pounding into her face.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top