Chris Burket
REDuser Sponsor
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2007
- Messages
- 356
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Anyone have any suggestions for a good on camera mic for the Red? Also a lav mic (wired, not wireless).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Sam, I don't consider myself a nay-sayer. And I do understand that there are times when a microphone needs to be attached to a camera body for one reason or another. I also understand that people have different standards when it comes to the audio product they deliver. For the product I deliver, perfectly good, is not good enough.
Video being equal, which would you want accompanying your Red footage?
Adequate Audio, Good Audio, or Great Audio?
I agree. I've served my time as a sound recordist so have to admit being a little biased. To me using audio from a camera mic is always going to be guide audio i.e never used for programme use. Respectfully, from a cinematography point of view its a bit like carrying the camera and tripod in to a room and filming from the place you first put the tripod down from convenience without proper regard to framing, perspective and all of the considerations that you would have to compose a shot, not to mention the noises that the mic will pic up from camera operation and breathing, grunting and so on from the camera operator. Money is best spent on a mic stand and long cable if theres no recordist. The very first rule of recording is mic placement, unless its correct then no matter how good the mic it cant do its job to best effect. The other good thing about proper mic placement is its free and usually the easiest way to improve audio.
Not to throw a wrench in a discussion where we all mostly agree but has anyone used a Parabolic Mic reflector as they use commonly in sports arenas or is the sound overly distorted? It seems like a perfect idea for the shotgun owners out there.
We have a few parabolic dishes here, We use them for wildlife recording. But its a bit like listening down a drain pipe. So far as I recall any device that creates directionality by introducing phase filtering will start to sound odd and has more coloration. The Schoeps CMIT and MKH60 are much better controlled than most mics in this regard and they use well designed tube and even they have noticeable coloration. The more directional the mic then the effects are more severe. A parabolic dish as its very directional has more coloration. Thats not to say they are unusable, they have their uses. If you can use a very good Omni mic or better still a very controlled cardioid mic (MKH40 or CCM4) facing in to the dish then you stand a better chance of getting usable audio.
There may be other solutions to consider also, If your using a long lens and have a small area to cover the action then it may be you can get a mic on a radio link hidden near to the subject.
The other practical point when using 416, MKH60 and CMIT mic's and may be other mics of this sort of 'length' when they are placed in safe area (overscan) in the 16 x 9 view finder of the camera then usually they match the perspective of the shot quite well. This can annoy the camera man at times but does put the mic in the right place.
Awesome feedback Dave. Thnx.
RE:"If you can use a very good Omni mic or better still a very controlled cardioid mic (MKH40 or CCM4) facing in to the dish then you stand a better chance of getting usable audio."
That's pretty much what I thought, as the Cardoid or Hyper-Cardoid pattern should intersect nicely with the focal point of the parabola. I imagine that recordist at 20' from the subject would get much better sound and more rejection than merely pointing the shotgun from a 12' boompole.