- Thread starter
- #21
David Nardini
Well-known member
Altering with the Log curve is not really helping you preserve highlight details, you are just moving the grey point so it seems that way. Remember you are likely displaying this on a 2.2 monitor. http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_bkp96efBnsQ/SPLNB8KvPXI/AAAAAAAAA-Y/GhXeZp5TiJM/s400/curves.jpg The green curve is Log-90 (nearly the same as RedLog), the cyan curve is 2.2 gamma, so as Log curve is above the 2.2 gamma curve (for all but the darkness shadow detail) the image will appear brighter. But all the curve clips at the some point, so all contain the same dynamic range. The reason to use a log curve over 2.2 gamma (and particularly over linear -- see old post: http://cineform.blogspot.com/2007/09/10-bit-log-vs-12-bit-linear.html) is to do with maintainly visually lossless compression through post production. If you need to extract details for Log 90 highest, any greater than 8-bit curves filter will do the trick.
Hmmm ... I wish I could understand in totality ! I can see that all curves hit the same black and white points ... (ie : I take it this means their 'values' are the same and therefore do not change). Therefore, the shape (which is not a million miles from the Gamma node in Shake) is just, as you say, make it seem as though I am ? right ?
So, bottom line, how do I [ If you need to extract details for Log 90 highest, any greater than 8-bit curves filter will do the trick ] ... I'm not totally clear what you mean by this ? and practically how do I achieve this ?
BTW : thanks for responding :usd:
EDIT : re-reading this, I guess you mean 16bit or float pipeline and lowering the white point in curves (Photoshop terminology) ?