Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Set up time vs a 7D

But with the 7D I am finding color grading difficult. If I push the footage to far it falls apart. But I really like the fast paced production. I can be set up and rolling in 10 minutes and I normally shoot a restaurant in 2+ hours.

That can be true, unless you expose the 7D very, very carefully. Underexposing slightly and over-filling usually will solve the problem. Choice of output LUTs (or custom curves) can also help in the final, provided you have a decent color-correction program like Resolve, Baselight, Pablo, or any of the other tools in that range. When we push the image into Rec709 color space, we can typically get a reasonable look out of it, but I agree, the image falls apart if you have to push it too far. What I see looks very "steppy" -- not enough bits. (Canon claims 14 bits in RAW, but my gut tells me their JPEG compression is doing a lot of damage to the bits that are there.)

There's no comparison to Red, as far as I'm concerned -- the Red makes far better pictures in the right hands. But I think the 7D can still do an acceptable job for certain kinds of projects, especially when portability and run & gun are mandatory. Not what I would choose if we had a reasonable budget and a great DP.
 
I have looked at the C300 but thought the same thing about price vs. performance compared to the 7D. Then I read about a new camera they were coming out with, I think it was another version of the 1D that used a better codec like MotionJpeg. Their C300 is still based off of the h264 codec. I found that odd and it seemed Canon was doing everything it could to stay on top. So now you have a c300 with built in audio but same codec as my 7D, and a D1 with a better codec that is a digital still camera but not the c300 they built for film making?

The C300 uses Canon's XF Codec, NOT H.264. This is a very similar codec to Sony's XDCam 4:2:2 (you can play C300 clips in Sony's MXF player) and you can select 35Mb/s or 50Mb/s recording. The original post was asking for a camera with additional latitude for post grading and the C300 offers that while maintaining the simple setup and EF lenses. Shoot your own tests and you'll see the difference.
 
Back
Top