Kim Frank
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 21, 2009
- Messages
- 524
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 44
I shot quite often with Red M and Red Mx, but I thought I'd give you guys some insight into my first time experience with shooting Scarlet and greenscreen. Here you can take a look at the final result:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgfNSNPRpJI
The whole Project was under enormous time and money pressure, why it isn't as perfect as I would have wished it to be, but I'm satisfied after all. All Backgrounds were illustrated and animated before the shoot and I had one week to cut and composite.
We shot with two Scarlets and Zeiss Cp2s at 800 ISO, 25 fps, 100th shutter and 3200 K.
The greenscreen is a permanent installed studio with prelit tungsten fixtures. Cycs for the walls and two 6K ballon lights for the floor.
Overall the keying with Primatte worked okay, although I have to say that the Scarlets visible Noise and little artifacts at 800ISO made it harder than I thought.
The owner of the Studio told me that their tests showed that the perfect setting for Scarlet and greenscreen is between 320 and 500 ISO and that the tungsten balanced lights are not a big factor in quality. That's why I didn't use filtration, what I normally did when shooting greenscreen with Red and tungsten but even without and with 800ISO I was missing about 1 1/2 stops and because of the dancing (much more was shot but cut by the label) I didn't want to shoot at a 50th.
The CP2 weren't sharp enough to get close to the illustrations why I had to use a lot of sharpening what made the noise of the Scarlet even more visible.
I am really not that satisfied with the material, although the result is okay I think, but I shot Greenscreen before in a much bigger studio with much more light and even with a Red One M (not MX) and Red Pro Primes at 320 ISO, 100th shutter and with 80C blue filter, I was able to get far better results then this time.
I would have loved to test a blue filter, because I think a lot had to do with not using the sensor at his sweet spot of 5000 K. The noise got really heavy and at 3200K the material still was too warm tinted.
But after all I can't get rid of the feeling, that the picture quality of a RED One MX is better then Scarlets or at least even. I have yet to find a comparison between scarlet and Epic to prove me, that they are similar.
Im gonna have another Scarlet shoot next week and hopefully have some time for testing. I really wish that I will be more satisfied this time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgfNSNPRpJI
The whole Project was under enormous time and money pressure, why it isn't as perfect as I would have wished it to be, but I'm satisfied after all. All Backgrounds were illustrated and animated before the shoot and I had one week to cut and composite.
We shot with two Scarlets and Zeiss Cp2s at 800 ISO, 25 fps, 100th shutter and 3200 K.
The greenscreen is a permanent installed studio with prelit tungsten fixtures. Cycs for the walls and two 6K ballon lights for the floor.
Overall the keying with Primatte worked okay, although I have to say that the Scarlets visible Noise and little artifacts at 800ISO made it harder than I thought.
The owner of the Studio told me that their tests showed that the perfect setting for Scarlet and greenscreen is between 320 and 500 ISO and that the tungsten balanced lights are not a big factor in quality. That's why I didn't use filtration, what I normally did when shooting greenscreen with Red and tungsten but even without and with 800ISO I was missing about 1 1/2 stops and because of the dancing (much more was shot but cut by the label) I didn't want to shoot at a 50th.
The CP2 weren't sharp enough to get close to the illustrations why I had to use a lot of sharpening what made the noise of the Scarlet even more visible.
I am really not that satisfied with the material, although the result is okay I think, but I shot Greenscreen before in a much bigger studio with much more light and even with a Red One M (not MX) and Red Pro Primes at 320 ISO, 100th shutter and with 80C blue filter, I was able to get far better results then this time.
I would have loved to test a blue filter, because I think a lot had to do with not using the sensor at his sweet spot of 5000 K. The noise got really heavy and at 3200K the material still was too warm tinted.
But after all I can't get rid of the feeling, that the picture quality of a RED One MX is better then Scarlets or at least even. I have yet to find a comparison between scarlet and Epic to prove me, that they are similar.
Im gonna have another Scarlet shoot next week and hopefully have some time for testing. I really wish that I will be more satisfied this time.