Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Scarlet Footage?

I wouldnt mind checking out a RAW motion version of that without any compression, throw it into premiere and play with it. Dont get me wrong, looks awesome. The RAW version will show the full glory
 
is there any reliable way to tell the difference between noise, and fine detail which is mangled by the compression for web display?
 
Alex Sutherland said:
The darkest parts are clean, but you see some noise on the critter's temples. It's a far sight better than my EX1, though. Is there any word from which make of the Scarlet this shot came? 2/3?
Click to expand...

There's always a noise nazi no matter what. Every movie I've ever seen in my entire life has had noise in it somewhere, in some shot. I've never walked out of a theatre thinking to myself "It would have been a good movie if it hadn't been for the noise in that one sequence", or, "Wow that movie sucked, but at least I didn't see any noise in any of the shots". And of course if you're sitting a foot away from the screen, you're going to see noise.

This is a test shot with the 2/3 chip using a 35mm lens.
 
Alex Sutherland said:
The darkest parts are clean, but you see some noise on the critter's temples. It's a far sight better than my EX1, though. Is there any word from which make of the Scarlet this shot came? 2/3?
Click to expand...

Shot on the 2/3″ Scarlet with 100mm PL mount RED PRO PRIME. Shot at T5.6 with the lizard about 4-5 inches from the lens. (from Jarred).
 
Leaf Baimbridge said:
There's always a noise nazi no matter what. Every movie I've ever seen in my entire life has had noise in it somewhere, in some shot. I've never walked out of a theatre thinking to myself "It would have been a good movie if it hadn't been for the noise in that one sequence", or, "Wow that movie sucked, but at least I didn't see any noise in any of the shots". And of course if you're sitting a foot away from the screen, you're going to see noise.

This is a test shot with the 2/3 chip using a 35mm lens.
Click to expand...

Please excuse me for daring criticize the quality of anything.
 
Yes, the footage makes me very excited about the Scarlet. I was considering not buying one, but that footage convinced me.
 
Leaf Baimbridge said:
There's always a noise nazi no matter what. Every movie I've ever seen in my entire life has had noise in it somewhere, in some shot. I've never walked out of a theatre thinking to myself "It would have been a good movie if it hadn't been for the noise in that one sequence", or, "Wow that movie sucked, but at least I didn't see any noise in any of the shots".
Click to expand...

Saw a movie on blu-ray recently, and even though the movie was not my cup of tea, I thought it would have been a lot better without the monumental heavy virtually unwatchable noise inside and outside on everything. I saw a Red shot movie in a cinema before that, and it sucked to me, but I thought at least it did not have any noise.

Now you have two anti-noise zealots hear ;) .

Content maybe king, but content done well looks better.
 
footage from scarlet

footage from scarlet

it does look fab , but really everything looks great with a 100mm lens ... (you can stick it on a mobile phone and it will look great...) it would be great to see some simple daylight street /wide angel footage...
anyway hoping to get more info soon ...
Bests
Yoni
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top