Dan Hudgins
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2007
- Messages
- 1,369
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- San Francisco, CA USA
- Website
- www.dancad3d.com
Bin before or after interpolation
Bin before or after interpolation
Binning in the sensor, like from 4K to 2K, makes the de-Bayer artifacts moire and aliasing, larger than binning through image down size after interpolation, the way red Interpolates "full processing" at 4K then down sizes to 2K and HD makes it easier to get good results, and the dynamic range benefit is similar to doing it in the sensor or using larger and fewer pixels in the first place.
If you have three cameras with sensors of equal size active area:
1) 2K sensor Bayer to record
2) 4K bin in sensor and output 2K Bayer data to record
3) 4K recorded and reduced to 2K after interpolation and processing
Camera 3, like REDONE in some ways, will produce similar dynamic range but smaller artifacts.
Camera 2) may have resolution issues over camera 1) because of the smaller pixels in the bin group picking up moire and so the way you can sharpen cameras 1) and 2) are not identical and the results are not identical. With camera 1) the sharpen for the anti-OLPF can make a more definite peek, in sensor bin makes some "confusion" due to the "fractured" area within the binned space not forming from a single peak.
Bin before or after interpolation
Yes binned.
Binning in the sensor, like from 4K to 2K, makes the de-Bayer artifacts moire and aliasing, larger than binning through image down size after interpolation, the way red Interpolates "full processing" at 4K then down sizes to 2K and HD makes it easier to get good results, and the dynamic range benefit is similar to doing it in the sensor or using larger and fewer pixels in the first place.
If you have three cameras with sensors of equal size active area:
1) 2K sensor Bayer to record
2) 4K bin in sensor and output 2K Bayer data to record
3) 4K recorded and reduced to 2K after interpolation and processing
Camera 3, like REDONE in some ways, will produce similar dynamic range but smaller artifacts.
Camera 2) may have resolution issues over camera 1) because of the smaller pixels in the bin group picking up moire and so the way you can sharpen cameras 1) and 2) are not identical and the results are not identical. With camera 1) the sharpen for the anti-OLPF can make a more definite peek, in sensor bin makes some "confusion" due to the "fractured" area within the binned space not forming from a single peak.