- Thread starter
- #41
jake blackstone
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
- Messages
- 3,984
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Website
- jake-blackstone.com
Jake, we surely agree that RT grading is not only desirable for client supervised but also for "private" sessions because keeping the pace up is a vital part of a successful grading session.
Apple Color is not RT if SDI monitoring is used. But Resolve on the Mac seems to be, isn't it? A big reason to invest the 1k, IMO. Funny how ridiculous cheap Resolve on the Mac is if it holds up to the peoples expectations, great times.
Hans
Resolve indeed is a real time device. But to be honest, real time performance is not the real deal breaker for me. I still use my old trusty Lustre, where any grades and effects I apply have to be rendered for real time playback. If needed, for a quick event preview, I can always use RAM cache playback.
Personally, any one single feature of Resolve, including real time performance or the incredible tracker wouldn't been enough to persuade me to consider it. It is the performance of all of the components in the whole package, that I need to see. If Resolve can do all of these great things, but, for example, is a lousy color grading device or it has lousy conforming tools (I'm not saying, that any of this applies to Resolve), then it all doesn't really matter, right?
Actually, come to think of it, that is the very reason why I stuck with Lustre for so long. It has incredible color grading capabilities and interface, everything else is ... no comment...