Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Log in
  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

RELEASED: BETA REDAlert! (v3.4.2)

Brent Carter

Brent Carter

REDUSER.NET
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Messages
4,992
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Irvine CA
RED ALERT! & REDline & REDrushes (v3.4.2)

New Features:

* TC Burn in for RL and RR
* Added Select RSX for setting look to RL and RR
* Added shutter and build output to RL metadata output
* Added DNxHD output (needs a the new codec from Avid or output is noise)

Bug Fixes:

* Misc fixes

Thanks, BC
 
Some QT wrapper issues not resolved?

Some QT wrapper issues not resolved?

Hi Brent,
Seems the QT wrappers are still not working for certain clips. I'm trying to make proxies from an R3D file, and all I can come up with is the _H proxy, if I select Make All. The function works on certain clips from that batch, but not all of them.

Tried both the Source Folder and a Destination Folder.

Is there a backwards-compatibility issue with RedRushes?

Marc-André Ferguson
 
May i ask you if in the feature will be a perfect match between the image corrected displayed in Red Alert and the Qt references created from that?

I mean , we know that there is a problem using the curves, but even without using the curves after some adjustment like exposure contrast WB etc...the QT references created are quite far from the image that i can see in Red Alert...

So,there is hope for that?

Thanks

G
 
Luminance said:
Hi Brent,
Seems the QT wrappers are still not working for certain clips. I'm trying to make proxies from an R3D file, and all I can come up with is the _H proxy, if I select Make All. The function works on certain clips from that batch, but not all of them.
Click to expand...

Is it working for some but not for others?
 
4K 16x9 _M wrappers play fine in QT player - but will NOT render in compressor - _H works fine - used 3.0 and 3.1 Quicktime component -

Quicktime 7.5 - OSX 10.5.4 (doens't work on 10.4.11 either)

renders are all good RedRushes
 
Luminance said:
Right.
Most clips work no problem.
Some clips give me 3 or the 4 proxies, and then another clip only gives me _H.
Kind of odd.
Thanks!
Click to expand...

Very strange. Rob and I are looking at it now and have some hints as to where the problem might be. It looks like it actually goes back quite few versions.
 
The DNxHD output will work properly when the new one is released from Avid.
 
Luminance said:
Right.
Most clips work no problem.
Some clips give me 3 or the 4 proxies, and then another clip only gives me _H.
Kind of odd.
Thanks!
Click to expand...

Fixed. New version v3.4.3 going up for download soon.
 
Forsooth...A PC Version on the Horizon?

Forsooth...A PC Version on the Horizon?

Deanan, if a PC version magically appeared you would go down in RED history as the savior of multitudes, a messiah of the masses, the one who could turn water into wine, (or at least R3D's into AVI's) and you would be revered for time immemorial.

What say you, oh prophet of REDness...? :whistling:

aloha,

Keith
 
Denan

What about the differences between the image displayed in Red Alert! and the image created as a Quicktime Ref?

Are you working on that or it's just not possible have the same image (i mean now is pretty close but the color and the exposure it's actually not the same...)

Thanks

G
 
Gabriele Turchi said:
Denan

What about the differences between the image displayed in Red Alert! and the image created as a Quicktime Ref?

Are you working on that or it's just not possible have the same image (i mean now is pretty close but the color and the exposure it's actually not the same...)

Thanks

G
Click to expand...

The problem you're seeing is the classic QT gamma problem.
 
Deanan said:
The problem you're seeing is the classic QT gamma problem.
Click to expand...

Well actually i am not talking about the gamma problem using the curves etc...i am talking about without touch the curves , the image is not the same , is close , but the color and in general i can't say that is the xact same

does anybody noticed that ?

And what about the gamma problem?News for the future realase?

Thanks

G
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top