Marc Pilato
Well-known member
Redirect 2016."outdoor adventure lifestyle story".Your first technical thoughts?
Hello,
it's my first thread:sorry if it's the wrong forum.
I've just viewed the seven videos online among the 8 contestants.It seems the technical qualities are globally a little bit less good than the last REDirect (surfing lifestyle) which was shot with the Epic M Dragon.
Not sure at all it's because Scarlet W (i'm waiting for the beast!).I'd like to debate mainly about technical qualities more than the stories.For example:
1/ about "The process" by Jess Hoffman:
I am very fond of B&W.Is the Scarlet W monochrome would have been a lot more superior when viewing on youtube or vimeo? and why?
2/More important, i found almost all shots in very low light not very good.Except on "Flakes of folklore"( Matt Hardy) which is btw my vote (but i'm waiting for the 8th video coming).Is it a problem from the Scarlet W? I think not but i don't know how to avoid " group of pixels" in dark area.Is it youtube compression?or is it technical choices (exposure ...)
3/ all the macro i've seen in theses 7 shorts are very nice.Do you think the macro shots can be good even with an average lens unlike landscapes which need superior lens to be perfect?.I think the lens used in these videos can make the difference.
4/ Useless to say sound is very important.You can judge the variations.
But the story can make the difference.A good story and we forget the technical qualities!
As we say in french: Que le meilleur gagne!
What do you think?
PS: Vote before august 8 th
Hello,
it's my first thread:sorry if it's the wrong forum.
I've just viewed the seven videos online among the 8 contestants.It seems the technical qualities are globally a little bit less good than the last REDirect (surfing lifestyle) which was shot with the Epic M Dragon.
Not sure at all it's because Scarlet W (i'm waiting for the beast!).I'd like to debate mainly about technical qualities more than the stories.For example:
1/ about "The process" by Jess Hoffman:
I am very fond of B&W.Is the Scarlet W monochrome would have been a lot more superior when viewing on youtube or vimeo? and why?
2/More important, i found almost all shots in very low light not very good.Except on "Flakes of folklore"( Matt Hardy) which is btw my vote (but i'm waiting for the 8th video coming).Is it a problem from the Scarlet W? I think not but i don't know how to avoid " group of pixels" in dark area.Is it youtube compression?or is it technical choices (exposure ...)
3/ all the macro i've seen in theses 7 shorts are very nice.Do you think the macro shots can be good even with an average lens unlike landscapes which need superior lens to be perfect?.I think the lens used in these videos can make the difference.
4/ Useless to say sound is very important.You can judge the variations.
But the story can make the difference.A good story and we forget the technical qualities!
As we say in french: Que le meilleur gagne!
What do you think?
PS: Vote before august 8 th