Damien Molineaux
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2006
- Messages
- 1,054
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 55
- Location
- Geneva | Switzerland
- Website
- c-sideprod.ch
Ah, what a dilemma,
Hard drives are really coming down in price. 320 GB 3.5" SATA drives cost barely more than LTO-3 tapes (400 GB). Drives are faster, although tapes are pretty fast now, but access to, and use of the content is immediat from a drive. The real question now is about durability. Are tapes sturdier than drives ?
To convince producers to go with Red, I need to be able to offer them a reliable storage solution for their footage. I've been looking into LTO-3 and SDLT, but tapes are quite expensive, as are drives. SDLT drives have the advantage of being available in Gigabit connections, which I haven't seen with LTO-3 (Ultra 160 SCSI only). Now I'm kinda leaning towards copying Red Drives on the set to a RAID 1 (mirror), then I keep a disc and the production keeps one.
But what about long term archival ?
Cheers,
Damien
Hard drives are really coming down in price. 320 GB 3.5" SATA drives cost barely more than LTO-3 tapes (400 GB). Drives are faster, although tapes are pretty fast now, but access to, and use of the content is immediat from a drive. The real question now is about durability. Are tapes sturdier than drives ?
To convince producers to go with Red, I need to be able to offer them a reliable storage solution for their footage. I've been looking into LTO-3 and SDLT, but tapes are quite expensive, as are drives. SDLT drives have the advantage of being available in Gigabit connections, which I haven't seen with LTO-3 (Ultra 160 SCSI only). Now I'm kinda leaning towards copying Red Drives on the set to a RAID 1 (mirror), then I keep a disc and the production keeps one.
But what about long term archival ?
Cheers,
Damien