REDCODE 42...

[Jannard]

At RC42, why isn't possible to shoot in 4k 16:9 ?

Hardware constraints of the RED ONE. Not enough mice in the cage...

Jim

 

[Stephen Strangways]

For anyone trying to find?

http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=35033

Thank you! I never would have found it otherwise.

 

[Michael Dalton]

I was wondering if someone can post a chart for redcode 42 and what they equal in time that one can record to flash cards. I'd be looking at 16gb cards or greater.

I spend much of my time in remote areas and need to factor all this in. Also can the Scarlet S35 shoot a choice between r42 and r80? Or is it one and none?

Thanks!

 

[Nathan Warren]

I, too, am looking for a chart for Redcode 42. Has anyone noted the transfer rate using Redcode 42 as opposed to Redcode 36? Obviously, the actual transfer time depends on the system you are using. But, has anyone noticed a remarked increase in transfer times? Both on the replica and transcode sides. I won't have a chance to test the times before shooting begins.

Thanks.

If this has been answered previously, I apologize,
Nathan

 

[Jannard]

I, too, am looking for a chart for Redcode 42. Has anyone noted the transfer rate using Redcode 42 as opposed to Redcode 36? Obviously, the actual transfer time depends on the system you are using. But, has anyone noticed a remarked increase in transfer times? Both on the replica and transcode sides. I won't have a chance to test the times before shooting begins.

Thanks.

If this has been answered previously, I apologize,
Nathan

Since REDCODE is a reference number (variable compression), you can assume that REDCODE 42 has a 17% overall higher data rate than REDCODE 36. Use that number for relevant calculations.

Jim

 

[Pietro Impagliazzo]

REDCODE 14 for 3K on Scarlet...

Would that be a bad idea?

Just a thought considering how well the compression works, having a very low bandwidth and still RAW acquisition format is a nice thing.