Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

RED = New Era in VFX

Scott M

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2007
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
CONUS
Often I wonder what will be the next amazing effect in films, and I use the "Bullet Time" effect from the Matrix as an example.

This led me to wonder if RED has considered that it could take that effect to a new level.

Because of it's size and relatively cost effective nature, couldn't something like this:

matrixcamerasxz4.jpg


be achieved using RED's? In which case, the movement and travel of the "Bullet Time" effect could essentially become a non-linear series of "camera" movments in an epic moment in time? :D

If so, I think it'd be a pretty sweet project that would introduce the power and versatility this camera will bring to filmmaking. :cool:
 
Often I wonder what will be the next amazing effect in films, and I use the "Bullet Time" effect from the Matrix as an example.

This led me to wonder if RED has considered that it could take that effect to a new level.

Because of it's size and relatively cost effective nature, couldn't something like this:

matrixcamerasxz4.jpg


be achieved using RED's? In which case, the movement and travel of the "Bullet Time" effect could essentially become a non-linear series of "camera" movments in an epic moment in time? :D

If so, I think it'd be a pretty sweet project that would introduce the power and versatility this camera will bring to filmmaking. :cool:

Hi,

I was shooting bullet time on Friday using 50 Canon DSLR's & a Viper! Your biggest problem will be getting a license from Dayton Taylor at Digital Air who holds the pattents on the technique. The camera pan/tilt/roll heads we used were the ones from the Matrix! We speed ramped the array from 300 fps to 25 fps, more interesting effect IMHO.


Stephen
 
We actually did the bullet time effect with a single camera up in Vancouver a couple years ago in a movie called House of the Dead.. it was basically a big lazy susan that span a camera around very fast and the talent standed still (or moved) in the middle. Insurance and Bond company ended shutting it down pretty quick cause it was so friggin dangerous.

Using high speed cameras its very possible as well, as you can make time almost freeze.. I shot this scene of water at 500fps and coulda slowed it down alot more.

water_still.jpg

http://purposelabs.com/water_full_color.wmv
 
We did a hilariously low-tech version of Bullet Time on the upcoming release "Balls of Fury", where the actors playing ping-pong (to the death, of course!) froze, I wrapped around them with the Steadicam, and then they unfroze again. The CGI ball spinning in place was the crowning touch. Viewable here, I think about halfway through the trailer.

This was shot on the Panavision Genesis, by the way.
 
Hi Jarred,

A director in Zurich built a rig like that which spun the camera 360 degrees in about 1 second, using an Arri III @ 100 fps worked very well. Above 100fps the film jammed! I don't think that guy had any insurance!

Stephen


We actually did the bullet time effect with a single camera up in Vancouver a couple years ago in a movie called House of the Dead.. it was basically a big lazy susan that span a camera around very fast and the talent standed still (or moved) in the middle. Insurance and Bond company ended shutting it down pretty quick cause it was so friggin dangerous.

Using high speed cameras its very possible as well, as you can make time almost freeze.. I shot this scene of water at 500fps and coulda slowed it down alot more.

water_still.jpg

http://purposelabs.com/water_full_color.wmv
 
Your biggest problem will be getting a license from Dayton Taylor at Digital Air who holds the pattents on the technique. The camera pan/tilt/roll heads we used were the ones from the Matrix! We speed ramped the array from 300 fps to 25 fps, more interesting effect IMHO.


Stephen

you can patent something like that?

how dumb. What part of it is patented?
 
you can patent something like that?

how dumb. What part of it is patented?

Hi Justin,

So it would seem!

http://www.digitalair.com/intprop.html

I Quote;-
"Digital Air is committed to the enforcement of its intellectual property. We strongly urge owners of unlicensed camera systems, films, television commercials, music videos, sports programs and other properties that infringe our patents, as well as those planning to make such systems or properties, to contact us immediately for a license"

Stephen
 
Hi Justin,

So it would seem!

http://www.digitalair.com/intprop.html

I Quote;-
"Digital Air is committed to the enforcement of its intellectual property. We strongly urge owners of unlicensed camera systems, films, television commercials, music videos, sports programs and other properties that infringe our patents, as well as those planning to make such systems or properties, to contact us immediately for a license"

Stephen
how would they know? u can just say you used a different technique
 
I have also used that lazy susan rig here in vancouver a couple years ago... maaaan, that thing was a disaster just waiting to happen.

I personally think that the traditional bullet time methods have almost reached the end of their lifespan. With computers now able to re-create actors with very high precision and new highspeed cameras coming onto the market, it is becoming much simpler and cost effective to do bullet time.

Im personally curious to try the new digi 1000fps 2k Phantom camera... put that thing on a fairly fast moving rig and you will have something very similar to bullet time, but for a fracion of the cost and setup time.

Im still not to sure what RED's impact on visual effects is going to be. On one hand, its great to have access to 4k plates at no extra cost or re-scanning. But, the complete lack of grain is something that is a bit scarry to me as a VFX supervisor. It means that more work is going to have to be put into the CG to match RED's perfection...
 
Considering I'd seen the technique in the late 80's in England utilised by someone else, I hardly think they have a worldwide patent on a technique like that. Seems a bit too oppurtunist to me.
 
how would they know? u can just say you used a different technique

Hi,

There are a lot of patents, I have not read them all. I think it's the concept that is patented!

Stephen
 
Or you can add controlled grain back in..... Noise / Grain hides a multitude of sins.

Or perhaps new compositing techniques will arrive that will totally integrate CGI visuals with the RED look. Sounds like another R&D Project....

Graeme
 
A patent is only as strong as it's claims. Even if someone in the UK has prior art, it's still very hard and expensive to invalidate a patent.
 
Considering I'd seen the technique in the late 80's in England utilised by someone else, I hardly think they have a worldwide patent on a technique like that. Seems a bit too oppurtunist to me.

Hi,

Patents only come into effect after they are registered!

I alos understand a US patented & manufactured compositing system, was lifted from a BBC research project from many years earlier!

Stephen
 
adding controlled grain back in would only be an option if the VFX shot was a one-off... and it would be a pitty to spoil the beautiful RED footage with any added grain.

The lack of grain will just inevitably push VFX compositing to a higher level... just too bad the the clients wont understand that nor pay for the extra time.
 
Yeesh, bullet time. Paul Debevec figured out a way of doing this with just a static camera and a spinning mirror.

http://gl.ict.usc.edu/research/ConcaveSurroundOptics/

(optical flaws and all, this is probably the least interesting thing he's ever developed)

check out some of the technologies he's developed on http://www.debevec.org/

(some of these have made their way into movies already, like... Superman Returns... etc)

Some amazing ideas there - the ability to take footage shot on a specially developed stage and completely relight it in post, for example.

R.
 
How about motion control bullet time... you could change the entire setup with the push of a button... no tweaking each camera. I'm totally impartial of course. ;)

Ruairi... I checked out your site.. nice work you got there.. the milk commercials and the short are awesome.
 
Considering I'd seen the technique in the late 80's in England utilised by someone else, I hardly think they have a worldwide patent on a technique like that. Seems a bit too oppurtunist to me.

Intellectual property law is often the domain of thugs.

I looked at the patents, and I don't think they are enforceable. But I'm not a patent lawyer. On the other hand, I think there is enough prior art out there that is easily discoverable that this is a vanity patent.

I don't know if you can indict a ham sandwich, but you can sure patent it.
 
The secret to infringing on patents is to have a deeper pocket book than the person whose patent you are infringing on.
 
How about motion control bullet time... you could change the entire setup with the push of a button... no tweaking each camera. I'm totally impartial of course. ;)

Ruairi... I checked out your site.. nice work you got there.. the milk commercials and the short are awesome.

Cheers man - appreciated :)
 
Back
Top