Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

  • Hey all, just changed over the backend after 15 years I figured time to give it a bit of an update, its probably gonna be a bit weird for most of you and i am sure there is a few bugs to work out but it should kinda work the same as before... hopefully :)

Red Bashing On Forbes Website

Carey Lee Coffey

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
1,740
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
51
Location
Los Angeles
I came across this article on Forbes website. It's the biggest heap of bullshit lies and anti-Red rhetoric I've ever read. I copy/pasted some of the ridiculousness below. It's good for a laugh. Enjoy.

”At first glance, Scarlet might sound like the better deal. But RED cameras typically require a bunch of expensive extras. That’s part of the company’s strategy; lure filmmakers with a low base price and hit their pockets later with a plethora of expensive add-ons.”

“Theoretically, other Hollywood filmmakers should have been eager to order their own custom cameras from Sony. But they didn’t. They looked for cheaper alternatives, hence the success of the RED One. Unfortunately for moviegoers, this means that digital-only movies tend to look much worse than those that were shot on film.”

• In addition to beating the RED One at its own game, the C300 undercuts the release of Scarlet, RED’s long-awaited low-cost alternative (at twice the price, mind you).
• More importantly, the C300 gives tomorrow’s filmmakers a superior upgrade option when they move beyond their low-cost indie roots.
• The transition from the 5D Mark II to C300 should be fairly seamless.
• The compact size makes it insanely versatile.
• Unless Scarlet proves to be a vastly superior camera, the C300 is likely to take over this area of the market.
• Expect smaller and cost-cutting studios to be the earliest adopters of the C300. Look for a few heavy hitters in Hollywood to experiment with the format.
• This could easily become a prominent player in commercial development (an area where Canon’s existing cameras already excel).
• The C300 could become a leader in television production as well.
 
You'd expect better research for such an article, but hell, what do you expect?

Graeme
 
The article, in a nutshell: Canon is poised to sell a ton of C300 cameras, despite RED's slightly cheaper (or not) Scarlet-X introduction.

I know RED people won't be buying them, but onboard 50-Mbit 4:2:2 from a 3 pound camera with a gorgeous 4K sensor and kick-ass low-light capability, perfect EF mount compatibility, that can record hours of footage to cheap, ubiquitous CF cards for $16K street is something A LOT of people will want/use, especially to rent. And it comes with everything, even built-in ND.

I may be the only one around here who think so, but the C300 is going to be hugely successful, as an A-cam for pilots and indie filmmakers, and a B/C-cam for everything else.

P.s. My Epic-X is in transit as I type this. Epic-X is my A-cam. :-)
 
This is an absolutely ridiculous, agenda filled article. Star Wars III "the most film-like I ever saw" ? Proves how much he knows about this.

If there's one serious competitor to the Scarlet is the 1 year old SLOG enabled 13.5 stops monster Sony F3. Its incredible low light, dual link 10bit SDI 4:4:4 1080 60P are big value. The Canon, with its 8bit 4:2:2 (will SDI out even be 10 bit?) , 720p 60 pales in comparison to the Sony, and obviously to the RAW 4K Scarlet.
 
That article is a pile of steaming shhh......!


m
 
a Seamless transition from a $2500 camera body to a $20,000 one? Yeah that seems seamless to me. Oh yeah... paying $17,500 bucks to upgrade to something that has more noise in low light shots (based on examples so far) seems like a great investment.
 
Now instead of DSLR bashing it will be C300 bashing? Seriously guys who cares. Focus on learning the Scarlet and prove it's worth by posting great content.
 
Probably the writer that predicted the dismal failure of the I-Phone.
 
Probably the writer that predicted the dismal failure of the I-Phone.

Did you read the article? He's not predicting that Scarlet will be a dismal failure, he's predicting that the C300 will sell well.
 
50Mbit, 8 bit, 4:2:2. And Canon wanna win the game.
I think I play a different game now.
Great article, print it and save it for when you run out of toilet paper.
 
On the second page at the bottom theres a link to report corrections, feel free to email forbes about the slander, I did
 
You all could just tweet him... @LouisBedigian I haven't but just saying...more direct way to puting out his faults and in a nice 140 characters long sentence

I'm confused how the Canon undercuts the Scarlet but is twice the price? (their wording)

"In addition to beating the RED One at its own game, the C300 undercuts the release of Scarlet, RED’s long-awaited low-cost alternative (at twice the price, mind you)."

My english must be bad...I thought undercut means comes under the Scarlet? Isn't that a bad thing but they say its good? ::confused::
 
I thought that Red One game was 4.5k recorded images.
And canons game is 1080p recorded images.
Can anyone explain like I'm a 4 year old ?
Just kidding, don't bother.
 
Back
Top