- Thread starter
- #41
Tim Jones
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2008
- Messages
- 316
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Huntsville, AL, USA
- Website
- www.productionbackup.com
Wait for the DAT320
Wait for the DAT320
Wait for DAT320 to become more widely available after the new year. The DAT160 is a good option for capacity, while DAT media not as long-life as LTO, I still have DDS 1 tapes that were written in 1991 on the original Archive Python 1.2GB drives that we restore from in our new BRU version backwards compatibility tests. As to performance, it is very slow at 6MB/sec. This translates to Approximately 21.6GB/hour. With the DAT320, the performance number moves to 12MB/sec, so you'll double that to 42.3GB/hour, so your archival times will be cut in half.
HTH,
Tim
Wait for the DAT320
Hi Mathias,Hi
Have any of you used the HP StorageWorks DAT 160 USB External Tape Drive for storage? Is there any disadvantages if i don´t need more than 80GB pr project/day? Is the transfer super-slow or the media unstable/unreliable?
Mathias
Wait for DAT320 to become more widely available after the new year. The DAT160 is a good option for capacity, while DAT media not as long-life as LTO, I still have DDS 1 tapes that were written in 1991 on the original Archive Python 1.2GB drives that we restore from in our new BRU version backwards compatibility tests. As to performance, it is very slow at 6MB/sec. This translates to Approximately 21.6GB/hour. With the DAT320, the performance number moves to 12MB/sec, so you'll double that to 42.3GB/hour, so your archival times will be cut in half.
HTH,
Tim
Last edited: