Real life lens comparison! Leica VS Yashica VS Canon VS DogShidtOptiks

[BRANDON JAMESON]

http://vimeo.com/89117927



Real life lens comparison! Leica VS Yashica VS Canon VS DogShidtOptiks on FS700 Slog2

from Mattia Santino Merli


Make your conclusions.
This is NOT a scientific test. My goal was to compare different lens in the same situation.
Same lut applied to all, NO sharpness added in post.
Lens tested:
Leica Summicron M 35mm F2.0
Yashica 50mm F1.4
Canon 24-105 F4 @50mm
DogShidtOptiks Flare Factory 58 F2.0-22

Shot on FS700 with Slog2.

 

[Grant H]

Can anyone offer insight as to why the Dog Shidt seemed to be resolving such wicked detail in comparison to the others? I'm new to the world of lens comparison.

 

[Bob Gundu]

I wouldn't look at the detail in this test as the subject is moving around resulting in soft focus at times. The DSO lens is an old school lens with low contrast coatings which helps in extending your dynamic range.

 

[Nick Morrison]

I wouldn't look at the detail in this test as the subject is moving around resulting in soft focus at times. The DSO lens is an old school lens with low contrast coatings which helps in extending your dynamic range.

WOW. Perfectly said. Bob Gundu...so glad to have you on these boards!

 

[Grant H]

I wouldn't look at the detail in this test as the subject is moving around resulting in soft focus at times. The DSO lens is an old school lens with low contrast coatings which helps in extending your dynamic range.

I'm actually referring also to the second test with the still subject (telephone box). Also as far as I've always known increased contrast actually helps the perception of sharpness, so despite being the least contrasty of the selection, it still seems to me (and my subjective eye) sharper.

 

[Les Dittert]

Looks like dog shit HD , all of it. You can't do lens tests at HD, sorry.