Rudi Herbert
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 1,433
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Gentlemen,
I'm in the process of building a couple of workstations to run CS5 and was wondering what would offer more bang for the buck, Quadro or GTX? I've used Quadro in the past for my other computers but looking at the specs of newer cards, the GTXs have more cuda cores, which would make them more suitable for the Mercury engine? I would want a card with a display port if possible, to feed a 10 bit Dreamcolor for grading, but that is secondary, I need good, stable RT performance and, if possible, would prefer not to go into the $thousands if I can stay in the $hundreds, preferably the low hundreds. This is not my main system, which is Rocket equipped.
I'm in the process of building a couple of workstations to run CS5 and was wondering what would offer more bang for the buck, Quadro or GTX? I've used Quadro in the past for my other computers but looking at the specs of newer cards, the GTXs have more cuda cores, which would make them more suitable for the Mercury engine? I would want a card with a display port if possible, to feed a 10 bit Dreamcolor for grading, but that is secondary, I need good, stable RT performance and, if possible, would prefer not to go into the $thousands if I can stay in the $hundreds, preferably the low hundreds. This is not my main system, which is Rocket equipped.