Ryan E. Walters
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,213
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Beaverton, Oregon
- Website
- www.ryanewalters.com
I am hoping that maybe someone here can shed some light on this issue- and maybe I'm just stuck and this is what it is ...
Is there a way to get around the purple sun issue?
I find it frustrating that a camera such as the Red One cannot just let clipped highlights go completely clipped. Or that it can't figure out the extreme clipping and then set that value to white instead of assigning it to purple. With all of the other digital formats I've used this has never been an issue- but it is a frustrating one to say the least.
I was out shooting some stock footage the other day and I wanted the sky to be mostly blown out and I wanted to keep my subject well exposed. Additionally, there were times when I wanted my subject to cross over the sun and get some fun flare action happening. I was very happy with the results that I go, and the footage looked great. It wasn't until I got back to edit and grade the footage that I realized what a pain it would be to remove the purple dot!
Each clip had it's own set of difficulties depending on how much crossing of the sun went on. For this particular clip I had to create 10 separate secondary rooms to track the sun and then use a selective mask / vignette to pull the gain (highlights) up to overexposure range. Since I am only allowed 8 secondaries I had to create an additional grade. Further more, I had to create the base grade that had not sun correction on it and then use only the parts of the clips that had the actual matte on it. Otherwise little bright circles would be left in areas when the matte was not traveling.
This should not be THIS complicated...
The Color Grade for one of the clips:
The FCP Timeline for the same clip:
Now I realize that part of the problem is how Color can (or cannot in this case) track moving objects as they go behind other objects. But the bigger issue is that I should not have to be dealing with this in the first place...
So, am I stuck, and it is what it is- or did I do something incorrectly in camera?
Is there a way to get around the purple sun issue?
I find it frustrating that a camera such as the Red One cannot just let clipped highlights go completely clipped. Or that it can't figure out the extreme clipping and then set that value to white instead of assigning it to purple. With all of the other digital formats I've used this has never been an issue- but it is a frustrating one to say the least.
I was out shooting some stock footage the other day and I wanted the sky to be mostly blown out and I wanted to keep my subject well exposed. Additionally, there were times when I wanted my subject to cross over the sun and get some fun flare action happening. I was very happy with the results that I go, and the footage looked great. It wasn't until I got back to edit and grade the footage that I realized what a pain it would be to remove the purple dot!
Each clip had it's own set of difficulties depending on how much crossing of the sun went on. For this particular clip I had to create 10 separate secondary rooms to track the sun and then use a selective mask / vignette to pull the gain (highlights) up to overexposure range. Since I am only allowed 8 secondaries I had to create an additional grade. Further more, I had to create the base grade that had not sun correction on it and then use only the parts of the clips that had the actual matte on it. Otherwise little bright circles would be left in areas when the matte was not traveling.
This should not be THIS complicated...
The Color Grade for one of the clips:
The FCP Timeline for the same clip:
Now I realize that part of the problem is how Color can (or cannot in this case) track moving objects as they go behind other objects. But the bigger issue is that I should not have to be dealing with this in the first place...
So, am I stuck, and it is what it is- or did I do something incorrectly in camera?