Gavin Greenwalt
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2006
- Messages
- 7,614
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 40
They try to justify bad behavior, by sighting worse behavior. An attitude that infects both sides of the political isle.
Didn't you just use Europe's health care system as an example of why America is superior?
---
I feel as if the worst behavior isn't the way either party conducts themselves it's that all the candidates have become "solution oriented" instead of "problem oriented".
We need to start at the beginning. "What is the problem?"
You can very easily get caught up and lost in the snowstorm trying to figure out how to do XYZ when the basic issue at hand is never even addressed "what do we want to do."
"We need universal health care." "No we don't." Isn't the right way to approach the problem. The first step is to address the problem. People aren't getting adequate health care. Which People? Does everybody deserve good health care? If so how do we go about getting health care for everybody? What do the different options cost? Which options can we afford? Where is this money going to come from?
These are the most basic simple starter questions. Instead they jump to the process. The solution. (They aren't even elected yet and they already have the solution?) I want to see a billion dollars spent on pilot programs, research, longitudal studies. I want to see a candidate who says.
"I don't know how the fuck to fix this problem, but I'm going to set in motion a process which figures out the *right* way to solve the problem that we all agree exists."
And then I want to see future politicians stick to the plan if it's producing results. I want to see science brought to our decision making process. There is a right answer. There is a truth. It might be murky and it might be hard to find but out in the world there is a measureable emperical reality. If we're going to spend trillions of dollars how about designing policy like you design an aircraft wing or camear!?
You don't see an engineer at boeing walk into a room and say "I think the airfoil is going to look like this." a second engineer raises his hand. "I think the front should be more curvy and I won't sign off until it's thicker." a third engineer raises his hand. "and I won't sign off until it's thinner in the back." Everybody compromises that's a 'fair' agreement and send off the plans to be machined into the production aircraft. They test. They investigate. They put the thing in a wind tunnel.
I am going to point a giant foam finger at the republican party for largely contributing to this with their goddamn "flip flopper" assault. Now every politician from here until memory fades is going to hold onto their policies with iron vices on both sides of the aisle for fear of *gasp* changing their mind after being presented with evidence.