Clayton Taylor
Well-known member
Can anyone share what setup or what they use for audio playback when shooting music videos?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
No need to hire sound mixer lol just get a beats by dre pill the big one. Ill use a dj to spin if its a big set however make suer they don't speed up or slow down the song it will be a nightmare but me I just use this beat pill xl shot MGK and many other big artist with it. Its loud and works fine plus you can use your phone for audio source and battery life last long real long on the XLCan anyone share what setup or what they use for audio playback when shooting music videos?
Hire a professional sound mixer. Do not attempt to do this yourself if you don't have experience with sound.
Specific methods are discussed here:
http://jwsoundgroup.net/index.php?/topic/12778-music-playback-questions/
http://jwsoundgroup.net/index.php?/topic/9681-music-video-workflow/
I've worked on at least 350-400 music videos in my time, some of them very, very major artists (Fleetwood Mac, Sting, Journey, Rolling Stones, you name it), and getting the music playback, speed, and timecode correct is not easy. Read the links I posted.WHAT!? All you need is a boombox CD/Mp3 player 99% of the time. The sound is already recorded. if you can't synch music video rushes by eye you shouldn't be editing music video, but to make things even easier just tape any old crappy mic to your Red to give yourself a guide track.
Isn't it also a question how long each take will be and how much the musicians will be able to do playback at all?
Clayton, go with what you have and don't worry. I think you are passionate enough to invest some sync time later if needed.
My experience with YouTube or Vimeo is, where most music videos stream from, that the sound is often not in synch anyway, if the connection is not fast enough.
BUT -- yes, to have the best equipment can't hurt, but only if the budget for this is not eating up other important things.
I've worked on at least 350-400 music videos in my time, some of them very, very major artists (Fleetwood Mac, Sting, Journey, Rolling Stones, you name it), and getting the music playback, speed, and timecode correct is not easy. Read the links I posted.
The problem with playing back music from a non-reference source, like an iPod or a CD player, is that the speed is going to drift over time. Only if you use a referenced time-code source is it 100% reliable and drift-free.
I have directed many, many music videos for major labels, and the worst I have ever seen is 2 frames of drift over the entire song, which was very easy to fix in the edit, and it only happened once. This might have been an issue in the days of cassette tapes, but seriously, what you talk about is not a real world issue, and the techniques you suggest are a rather silly waste of tiny production budgets.
I guess we were just unlucky, since we had Hollywood union crews who must not have known what they were doing.I have directed many, many music videos for major labels, and the worst I have ever seen is 2 frames of drift over the entire song, which was very easy to fix in the edit, and it only happened once.
I guess we were just unlucky, since we had Hollywood union crews who must not have known what they were doing.
The example I've used to demonstrate for film students is:
1) get two iPod Touches (or any two iPods you want)
2) put the same exact song and same file on each iPod
3) cue them up
4) play both iPods together at the exact same time so they start up exactly in sync.
In one minute, they'll be a second out of sync with each other. This is the problem with using non-referenced audio playback. The internal crystal source is generally not accurate enough in a cheap device. It generally works fine in a higher-end laptop or in a dedicated sound recorder with an internal TCXO clock crystal.
Sure, if you're cutting around a lot, you can cover it and just do pull-up edits. But if it's one shot, you'll have to manually either varispeed the audio or make little tiny cuts in it. God help you if it's multiple camera.
One second diff in one minute? I have never, ever seen this after 35 music videos total. Just never. Like I said, a few frames, MAX, but we have used only used an iPhone, a CD, and a laptop (Alienware)- never actually tried an Ipod, and IPods (old tech really, at this point) might have had weird behavior in this regard for some reason - no clue. I just tried an iPhone vs my computer, 3 times, and they stayed exactly in synch every time.
Anyway, in 2014, music videos cannot spare budgets for anything that is not absolutely necessary. This had never, ever been an issue, ever so it really is a silly waste of cash to hire a "specialist" for this. Usually we put the trainee PA on playback, using a $200 boombox and, no complaints so far or issues of any kind.
I can;t see how a single shot music video would be all that watchable in most instances, and even then, you could just varispeed the video a frame here or there, for like $40 of post time.