David Rasberry
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,266
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Oh, I didn't notice that.
Really strange.
Most cmos cameras do have several outputs from column buses, which enables ROI.
Eg. cheap Casio EX-FH25 has one row cut to pieces of 224 pixels, so different frame rates have horizontal resolution multiplied by this (224px/1000fps, 448px/240fps, 640px/120fps).
Maybe this explanes why Red's sensors are so affordable...
Btw, is there somewhere in these forums Epic's formats posted (resolutions, fps)?
When canon put 5d2 out there wasn't even term DSMC yet.
Maybe they didn't know what customers would want.
Or maybe they just thought that FF size is the thing people wants and don't mind line skipping artifacts.
And maybe they didn't think that movie mode was used professionally at all. Same thing when Sony put first dv(cam) in 1995-96. It wasn't meant for broadcasting, but it is still used for that.
I don't know if 5d2's sensor could handle windowing and how well, but seems to be quite natural that when next model is out, that would be the most important new feature of the camera. Or maybe second to raw recording.
I would not expect Canon to do full frame raw recording at motion rates on these still cams. It would price them out of their market range.