Kholi Hicks
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2007
- Messages
- 433
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Although Graeme is probably more biased than normal, I agree with him. I was one of the first people to acquire a D90 and after the initial "wow" of video and shallow depth, interchangeable lenses wore off I saw it for what it really is: novelty. I still took the time to do that massive write-up on DVXuser because I knew others would be in love with it and not care about the same things I did.
The D90's D-Movie mode isn't even a mode, it's just a tacked on extra with very very limited control. The 720p is not worthy of being termed 720p by any means, but mostly passable at 480p. For Web Content and run n'gun straight-to-dvd? Sure.
It's a pretty nice step forward, worth a look if you're considering an HV20 + Adapter setup in comparison or, heck, even an DVX100b + Adapter in comparison. It's no real substitute for something like an EX-1 or HPX170 + Adapter Setup and certainly not a barebones RED setup. I'll take a RED and some Vivitar lenses before I would commit to using a D90 and Zeiss glass; that's probably a given, though.
The D90's D-Movie mode isn't even a mode, it's just a tacked on extra with very very limited control. The 720p is not worthy of being termed 720p by any means, but mostly passable at 480p. For Web Content and run n'gun straight-to-dvd? Sure.
It's a pretty nice step forward, worth a look if you're considering an HV20 + Adapter setup in comparison or, heck, even an DVX100b + Adapter in comparison. It's no real substitute for something like an EX-1 or HPX170 + Adapter Setup and certainly not a barebones RED setup. I'll take a RED and some Vivitar lenses before I would commit to using a D90 and Zeiss glass; that's probably a given, though.